style: apply Prettier formatting to TS/JS/JSON/MD files
Add Prettier as a dev dependency with .prettierrc.json config and .prettierignore. Hook added via mirrors-prettier in pre-commit config. All TypeScript, JSON, Markdown, and YAML files auto-formatted. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
Eugene Mikhantyev
File diff suppressed because it is too large
Load Diff
@@ -1,485 +1,509 @@
|
||||
# Option 2: Dynamic Library Loading Plan
|
||||
|
||||
## Executive Summary
|
||||
|
||||
Replace the template-based schematic workflow with dynamic symbol loading from KiCad's installed symbol libraries. This would eliminate the 13-component limitation and provide access to ALL KiCad symbols (~10,000+ symbols from standard libraries).
|
||||
|
||||
**Current Status (Option 1):**
|
||||
- ✅ Template-based approach working
|
||||
- ✅ 13 component types supported
|
||||
- ❌ Limited symbol variety
|
||||
- ❌ Requires manual template updates for new types
|
||||
|
||||
**Proposed (Option 2):**
|
||||
- 🎯 Dynamic loading from `.kicad_sym` library files
|
||||
- 🎯 Access to ~10,000+ KiCad symbols
|
||||
- 🎯 No template maintenance required
|
||||
- 🎯 User can specify any library/symbol combination
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Problem Analysis
|
||||
|
||||
### kicad-skip Library Limitation
|
||||
|
||||
**Core Issue:** kicad-skip **cannot create symbols from scratch**. It can only:
|
||||
1. Clone existing symbols from a loaded schematic
|
||||
2. Modify properties of cloned symbols
|
||||
|
||||
**Current Workaround:** Pre-load template symbols in schematic file
|
||||
|
||||
**Proposed Solution:** Load symbols from KiCad's `.kicad_sym` library files, inject them into the schematic's `lib_symbols` section, then clone from there.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## KiCad Symbol Library Architecture
|
||||
|
||||
### Symbol Library File Format (`.kicad_sym`)
|
||||
|
||||
KiCad symbol libraries are S-expression files containing symbol definitions:
|
||||
|
||||
```lisp
|
||||
(kicad_symbol_lib (version 20211014) (generator kicad_symbol_editor)
|
||||
(symbol "Device:R"
|
||||
(pin_numbers hide)
|
||||
(pin_names (offset 0))
|
||||
(in_bom yes)
|
||||
(on_board yes)
|
||||
(property "Reference" "R" ...)
|
||||
(property "Value" "R" ...)
|
||||
;; Graphics definitions
|
||||
(symbol "R_0_1" ...)
|
||||
(symbol "R_1_1"
|
||||
(pin passive line ...)
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
(symbol "Device:C" ...)
|
||||
(symbol "Device:L" ...)
|
||||
;; ... thousands more
|
||||
)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Standard KiCad Library Locations
|
||||
|
||||
**Linux:**
|
||||
- System libraries: `/usr/share/kicad/symbols/`
|
||||
- User libraries: `~/.local/share/kicad/8.0/symbols/` or `~/.config/kicad/8.0/symbols/`
|
||||
|
||||
**Windows:**
|
||||
- System libraries: `C:\Program Files\KiCad\9.0\share\kicad\symbols\`
|
||||
- User libraries: `%APPDATA%\kicad\8.0\symbols\`
|
||||
|
||||
**macOS:**
|
||||
- System libraries: `/Applications/KiCad/KiCad.app/Contents/SharedSupport/symbols/`
|
||||
- User libraries: `~/Library/Preferences/kicad/8.0/symbols/`
|
||||
|
||||
### Standard Library Files
|
||||
|
||||
Common libraries (each containing 50-500 symbols):
|
||||
- `Device.kicad_sym` - Passives (R, C, L, D, LED, Crystal, etc.)
|
||||
- `Connector.kicad_sym` - Connectors (headers, USB, etc.)
|
||||
- `Connector_Generic.kicad_sym` - Generic connectors
|
||||
- `Transistor_BJT.kicad_sym` - Bipolar transistors
|
||||
- `Transistor_FET.kicad_sym` - MOSFETs
|
||||
- `Amplifier_Operational.kicad_sym` - Op-amps
|
||||
- `Regulator_Linear.kicad_sym` - Voltage regulators
|
||||
- `MCU_*.kicad_sym` - Microcontrollers
|
||||
- `Interface_*.kicad_sym` - Interface ICs
|
||||
- ... 100+ more libraries
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Implementation Strategy
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 1: Library Discovery & Indexing
|
||||
|
||||
**Goal:** Build an index of all available symbols and their locations
|
||||
|
||||
**Implementation:**
|
||||
```python
|
||||
class SymbolLibraryManager:
|
||||
def __init__(self):
|
||||
self.library_paths = []
|
||||
self.symbol_index = {} # {"Device:R": "/path/to/Device.kicad_sym", ...}
|
||||
|
||||
def discover_libraries(self):
|
||||
"""Find all KiCad symbol libraries on the system"""
|
||||
search_paths = [
|
||||
"/usr/share/kicad/symbols/",
|
||||
os.path.expanduser("~/.local/share/kicad/8.0/symbols/"),
|
||||
os.path.expanduser("~/.config/kicad/8.0/symbols/"),
|
||||
]
|
||||
|
||||
for search_path in search_paths:
|
||||
if os.path.exists(search_path):
|
||||
for lib_file in os.listdir(search_path):
|
||||
if lib_file.endswith('.kicad_sym'):
|
||||
self.library_paths.append(os.path.join(search_path, lib_file))
|
||||
|
||||
def index_symbols(self):
|
||||
"""Parse all libraries and build symbol index"""
|
||||
for lib_path in self.library_paths:
|
||||
lib_name = os.path.basename(lib_path).replace('.kicad_sym', '')
|
||||
symbols = self._parse_library(lib_path)
|
||||
|
||||
for symbol_name in symbols:
|
||||
full_name = f"{lib_name}:{symbol_name}"
|
||||
self.symbol_index[full_name] = {
|
||||
'library': lib_name,
|
||||
'library_path': lib_path,
|
||||
'symbol_name': symbol_name
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
def _parse_library(self, lib_path):
|
||||
"""Parse .kicad_sym file and extract symbol names"""
|
||||
# Use sexpdata (already a dependency of kicad-skip)
|
||||
import sexpdata
|
||||
|
||||
with open(lib_path, 'r') as f:
|
||||
data = sexpdata.load(f)
|
||||
|
||||
symbols = []
|
||||
for item in data[2:]: # Skip header
|
||||
if isinstance(item, list) and item[0] == Symbol('symbol'):
|
||||
symbol_name = item[1] # e.g., "Device:R"
|
||||
# Extract just the symbol part after ':'
|
||||
if ':' in symbol_name:
|
||||
symbol_name = symbol_name.split(':')[1]
|
||||
symbols.append(symbol_name)
|
||||
|
||||
return symbols
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 2: Dynamic Symbol Injection
|
||||
|
||||
**Goal:** Load symbol definition from library file and inject into schematic
|
||||
|
||||
**Challenge:** kicad-skip works with loaded schematics, but we need to dynamically add symbols to the `lib_symbols` section.
|
||||
|
||||
**Solution:** Modify the schematic's S-expression data directly before loading with kicad-skip:
|
||||
|
||||
```python
|
||||
def inject_symbol_into_schematic(schematic_path, library_path, symbol_name):
|
||||
"""
|
||||
1. Read schematic S-expression
|
||||
2. Read library S-expression
|
||||
3. Extract symbol definition from library
|
||||
4. Inject into schematic's lib_symbols section
|
||||
5. Save modified schematic
|
||||
6. Reload with kicad-skip
|
||||
"""
|
||||
import sexpdata
|
||||
|
||||
# Load schematic
|
||||
with open(schematic_path, 'r') as f:
|
||||
sch_data = sexpdata.load(f)
|
||||
|
||||
# Load library
|
||||
with open(library_path, 'r') as f:
|
||||
lib_data = sexpdata.load(f)
|
||||
|
||||
# Find symbol definition in library
|
||||
symbol_def = None
|
||||
for item in lib_data[2:]:
|
||||
if isinstance(item, list) and item[0] == Symbol('symbol'):
|
||||
if symbol_name in str(item[1]):
|
||||
symbol_def = item
|
||||
break
|
||||
|
||||
if not symbol_def:
|
||||
raise ValueError(f"Symbol {symbol_name} not found in {library_path}")
|
||||
|
||||
# Find lib_symbols section in schematic
|
||||
lib_symbols_index = None
|
||||
for i, item in enumerate(sch_data):
|
||||
if isinstance(item, list) and item[0] == Symbol('lib_symbols'):
|
||||
lib_symbols_index = i
|
||||
break
|
||||
|
||||
# Inject symbol definition
|
||||
if lib_symbols_index:
|
||||
sch_data[lib_symbols_index].append(symbol_def)
|
||||
|
||||
# Save modified schematic
|
||||
with open(schematic_path, 'w') as f:
|
||||
sexpdata.dump(sch_data, f)
|
||||
|
||||
# Reload with kicad-skip
|
||||
return Schematic(schematic_path)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 3: Template Instance Creation
|
||||
|
||||
**Goal:** Create offscreen template instances that can be cloned
|
||||
|
||||
**After injection:** Symbol definition is in `lib_symbols`, but we need an instance to clone from:
|
||||
|
||||
```python
|
||||
def create_template_instance(schematic, library_name, symbol_name):
|
||||
"""
|
||||
Create an offscreen template instance that can be cloned
|
||||
Similar to our current _TEMPLATE_R approach
|
||||
"""
|
||||
# This requires directly manipulating the S-expression
|
||||
# Add a symbol instance at offscreen position with special reference
|
||||
|
||||
template_ref = f"_TEMPLATE_{library_name}_{symbol_name}"
|
||||
|
||||
# Create symbol instance (S-expression)
|
||||
symbol_instance = [
|
||||
Symbol('symbol'),
|
||||
[Symbol('lib_id'), f"{library_name}:{symbol_name}"],
|
||||
[Symbol('at'), -100, -100 - (len(schematic.symbol) * 10), 0],
|
||||
[Symbol('unit'), 1],
|
||||
[Symbol('in_bom'), Symbol('no')],
|
||||
[Symbol('on_board'), Symbol('no')],
|
||||
[Symbol('dnp'), Symbol('yes')],
|
||||
[Symbol('uuid'), str(uuid.uuid4())],
|
||||
[Symbol('property'), "Reference", template_ref, ...],
|
||||
# ... more properties
|
||||
]
|
||||
|
||||
# Inject into schematic and reload
|
||||
# ... (similar to inject_symbol_into_schematic)
|
||||
|
||||
return template_ref
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 4: User-Facing API
|
||||
|
||||
**Goal:** Simple interface for users to add any KiCad symbol
|
||||
|
||||
**New MCP Tool: `add_schematic_component_dynamic`**
|
||||
|
||||
```python
|
||||
def add_schematic_component_dynamic(params):
|
||||
"""
|
||||
Add component by library:symbol notation
|
||||
|
||||
Example:
|
||||
{
|
||||
"library": "Device",
|
||||
"symbol": "R",
|
||||
"reference": "R1",
|
||||
"value": "10k",
|
||||
"x": 100,
|
||||
"y": 100
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
OR using full notation:
|
||||
{
|
||||
"lib_symbol": "Device:R", # Full notation
|
||||
"reference": "R1",
|
||||
...
|
||||
}
|
||||
"""
|
||||
lib_symbol = params.get('lib_symbol') or f"{params['library']}:{params['symbol']}"
|
||||
|
||||
# 1. Check if symbol is already in schematic's lib_symbols
|
||||
# 2. If not, inject it from library file
|
||||
# 3. Create template instance if needed
|
||||
# 4. Clone template and set properties
|
||||
|
||||
return {"success": True, "reference": params['reference']}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Advantages Over Template Approach
|
||||
|
||||
### ✅ Unlimited Symbol Access
|
||||
- Access to ~10,000+ standard KiCad symbols
|
||||
- Support for custom user libraries
|
||||
- Support for 3rd-party libraries (JLCPCB, Espressif, etc.)
|
||||
|
||||
### ✅ No Maintenance Required
|
||||
- Template doesn't need updates for new component types
|
||||
- Automatically supports new KiCad library additions
|
||||
- Works with custom symbol libraries
|
||||
|
||||
### ✅ Better User Experience
|
||||
```
|
||||
User: "Add an STM32F103C8T6 microcontroller at position 100,100"
|
||||
AI: *Searches symbol index*
|
||||
*Finds MCU_ST_STM32F1:STM32F103C8Tx*
|
||||
*Loads from library*
|
||||
*Injects into schematic*
|
||||
*Places component*
|
||||
✓ Done!
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### ✅ Flexible Symbol Search
|
||||
```python
|
||||
# Find all resistors
|
||||
symbols = lib_manager.search_symbols(query="resistor")
|
||||
# Returns: ["Device:R", "Device:R_Small", "Device:R_Network", ...]
|
||||
|
||||
# Find all STM32 MCUs
|
||||
symbols = lib_manager.search_symbols(query="STM32", library="MCU_ST_STM32F1")
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Challenges & Mitigations
|
||||
|
||||
### Challenge 1: S-expression Manipulation Complexity
|
||||
|
||||
**Problem:** Directly manipulating S-expression data is error-prone
|
||||
|
||||
**Mitigation:**
|
||||
- Use `sexpdata` library (already a dependency)
|
||||
- Create helper functions for common operations
|
||||
- Add comprehensive validation and error handling
|
||||
- Extensive testing with various symbol types
|
||||
|
||||
### Challenge 2: Performance
|
||||
|
||||
**Problem:** Loading/reloading schematics after injection could be slow
|
||||
|
||||
**Mitigation:**
|
||||
- **Cache loaded symbols**: Once injected, symbol stays in schematic
|
||||
- **Batch injection**: Inject multiple symbols at once
|
||||
- **Lazy loading**: Only inject symbols when first used
|
||||
|
||||
### Challenge 3: Symbol Compatibility
|
||||
|
||||
**Problem:** Some symbols may have complex pin configurations or multiple units
|
||||
|
||||
**Mitigation:**
|
||||
- Start with simple 2-pin passives (R, C, L)
|
||||
- Gradually add support for multi-pin ICs
|
||||
- Handle multi-unit symbols (gates, OpAmp sections) explicitly
|
||||
- Document supported symbol types
|
||||
|
||||
### Challenge 4: Library Version Compatibility
|
||||
|
||||
**Problem:** KiCad symbol format may change between versions
|
||||
|
||||
**Mitigation:**
|
||||
- Parse KiCad version from library files
|
||||
- Version-specific handling if needed
|
||||
- Fallback to template approach for unsupported formats
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Implementation Phases
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase A: Proof of Concept (1-2 weeks)
|
||||
- [ ] Create `SymbolLibraryManager` class
|
||||
- [ ] Implement library discovery (Linux paths only)
|
||||
- [ ] Implement symbol indexing
|
||||
- [ ] Test with Device.kicad_sym (R, C, L)
|
||||
- [ ] Implement basic S-expression injection
|
||||
- [ ] Test end-to-end with simple components
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase B: Core Functionality (2-3 weeks)
|
||||
- [ ] Cross-platform library discovery (Windows, macOS)
|
||||
- [ ] Symbol search functionality
|
||||
- [ ] Template instance creation automation
|
||||
- [ ] Multi-pin component support
|
||||
- [ ] Error handling and validation
|
||||
- [ ] Unit tests for all operations
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase C: MCP Integration (1 week)
|
||||
- [ ] Create `add_schematic_component_dynamic` tool
|
||||
- [ ] Update `search_symbols` to use library index
|
||||
- [ ] Add `list_available_symbols` tool
|
||||
- [ ] Add `list_symbol_libraries` tool
|
||||
- [ ] Documentation and examples
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase D: Advanced Features (2-3 weeks)
|
||||
- [ ] Multi-unit symbol support (e.g., quad OpAmps)
|
||||
- [ ] Custom library registration
|
||||
- [ ] Symbol caching and optimization
|
||||
- [ ] 3rd-party library support (JLCPCB, etc.)
|
||||
- [ ] Symbol preview generation
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Migration Strategy
|
||||
|
||||
### Backward Compatibility
|
||||
|
||||
Keep template-based approach as fallback:
|
||||
|
||||
```python
|
||||
def add_schematic_component(params):
|
||||
"""Smart component addition with fallback"""
|
||||
# Try dynamic loading first
|
||||
try:
|
||||
if 'library' in params or 'lib_symbol' in params:
|
||||
return add_schematic_component_dynamic(params)
|
||||
except Exception as e:
|
||||
logger.warning(f"Dynamic loading failed: {e}, falling back to template")
|
||||
|
||||
# Fallback to template-based
|
||||
return add_schematic_component_template(params)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Gradual Rollout
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Week 1-2:** Implement basic dynamic loading
|
||||
2. **Week 3-4:** Test with power users, gather feedback
|
||||
3. **Week 5-6:** Make dynamic loading the default
|
||||
4. **Week 7+:** Deprecate template-only approach (keep as fallback)
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Success Criteria
|
||||
|
||||
### Must Have
|
||||
- [ ] Load symbols from Device.kicad_sym (passives)
|
||||
- [ ] Support R, C, L, D, LED (5 core types)
|
||||
- [ ] Cross-platform library discovery
|
||||
- [ ] Proper error handling
|
||||
|
||||
### Should Have
|
||||
- [ ] Support for all Device.kicad_sym symbols (~50 symbols)
|
||||
- [ ] Support for Connector.kicad_sym symbols
|
||||
- [ ] Symbol search by name/keyword
|
||||
- [ ] Performance: < 1 second per symbol injection
|
||||
|
||||
### Nice to Have
|
||||
- [ ] Support for all standard libraries (~10,000 symbols)
|
||||
- [ ] Multi-unit symbol support
|
||||
- [ ] Custom library registration
|
||||
- [ ] Symbol preview/documentation
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Risk Assessment
|
||||
|
||||
| Risk | Probability | Impact | Mitigation |
|
||||
|------|-------------|--------|------------|
|
||||
| S-expression parsing complexity | High | High | Use proven `sexpdata` library, extensive testing |
|
||||
| Performance degradation | Medium | Medium | Implement caching, lazy loading |
|
||||
| KiCad version incompatibility | Low | High | Version detection, format validation |
|
||||
| Template fallback breaks | Low | Medium | Maintain template approach in parallel |
|
||||
| User confusion | Medium | Low | Clear documentation, gradual rollout |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Conclusion
|
||||
|
||||
Dynamic library loading is **feasible and highly beneficial** for the schematic workflow. While the template-based approach (Option 1) provides immediate value with 13 component types, Option 2 would:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Eliminate the 13-component limitation**
|
||||
2. **Provide access to 10,000+ KiCad symbols**
|
||||
3. **Remove manual template maintenance**
|
||||
4. **Enable true "natural language PCB design"**
|
||||
|
||||
**Recommendation:**
|
||||
- ✅ **Keep Option 1 (expanded template) for immediate use**
|
||||
- ✅ **Implement Option 2 (dynamic loading) over 6-8 weeks**
|
||||
- ✅ **Maintain template fallback for compatibility**
|
||||
|
||||
This gives users immediate value while we build the robust long-term solution.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## References
|
||||
|
||||
- [KiCad File Formats Documentation](https://dev-docs.kicad.org/en/file-formats/)
|
||||
- [kicad-skip GitHub](https://github.com/mvnmgrx/kicad-skip)
|
||||
- [sexpdata Python Library](https://github.com/jd-boyd/sexpdata)
|
||||
- [KiCad Symbol Library Format Spec](https://dev-docs.kicad.org/en/file-formats/sexpr-intro/)
|
||||
# Option 2: Dynamic Library Loading Plan
|
||||
|
||||
## Executive Summary
|
||||
|
||||
Replace the template-based schematic workflow with dynamic symbol loading from KiCad's installed symbol libraries. This would eliminate the 13-component limitation and provide access to ALL KiCad symbols (~10,000+ symbols from standard libraries).
|
||||
|
||||
**Current Status (Option 1):**
|
||||
|
||||
- ✅ Template-based approach working
|
||||
- ✅ 13 component types supported
|
||||
- ❌ Limited symbol variety
|
||||
- ❌ Requires manual template updates for new types
|
||||
|
||||
**Proposed (Option 2):**
|
||||
|
||||
- 🎯 Dynamic loading from `.kicad_sym` library files
|
||||
- 🎯 Access to ~10,000+ KiCad symbols
|
||||
- 🎯 No template maintenance required
|
||||
- 🎯 User can specify any library/symbol combination
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Problem Analysis
|
||||
|
||||
### kicad-skip Library Limitation
|
||||
|
||||
**Core Issue:** kicad-skip **cannot create symbols from scratch**. It can only:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Clone existing symbols from a loaded schematic
|
||||
2. Modify properties of cloned symbols
|
||||
|
||||
**Current Workaround:** Pre-load template symbols in schematic file
|
||||
|
||||
**Proposed Solution:** Load symbols from KiCad's `.kicad_sym` library files, inject them into the schematic's `lib_symbols` section, then clone from there.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## KiCad Symbol Library Architecture
|
||||
|
||||
### Symbol Library File Format (`.kicad_sym`)
|
||||
|
||||
KiCad symbol libraries are S-expression files containing symbol definitions:
|
||||
|
||||
```lisp
|
||||
(kicad_symbol_lib (version 20211014) (generator kicad_symbol_editor)
|
||||
(symbol "Device:R"
|
||||
(pin_numbers hide)
|
||||
(pin_names (offset 0))
|
||||
(in_bom yes)
|
||||
(on_board yes)
|
||||
(property "Reference" "R" ...)
|
||||
(property "Value" "R" ...)
|
||||
;; Graphics definitions
|
||||
(symbol "R_0_1" ...)
|
||||
(symbol "R_1_1"
|
||||
(pin passive line ...)
|
||||
)
|
||||
)
|
||||
(symbol "Device:C" ...)
|
||||
(symbol "Device:L" ...)
|
||||
;; ... thousands more
|
||||
)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Standard KiCad Library Locations
|
||||
|
||||
**Linux:**
|
||||
|
||||
- System libraries: `/usr/share/kicad/symbols/`
|
||||
- User libraries: `~/.local/share/kicad/8.0/symbols/` or `~/.config/kicad/8.0/symbols/`
|
||||
|
||||
**Windows:**
|
||||
|
||||
- System libraries: `C:\Program Files\KiCad\9.0\share\kicad\symbols\`
|
||||
- User libraries: `%APPDATA%\kicad\8.0\symbols\`
|
||||
|
||||
**macOS:**
|
||||
|
||||
- System libraries: `/Applications/KiCad/KiCad.app/Contents/SharedSupport/symbols/`
|
||||
- User libraries: `~/Library/Preferences/kicad/8.0/symbols/`
|
||||
|
||||
### Standard Library Files
|
||||
|
||||
Common libraries (each containing 50-500 symbols):
|
||||
|
||||
- `Device.kicad_sym` - Passives (R, C, L, D, LED, Crystal, etc.)
|
||||
- `Connector.kicad_sym` - Connectors (headers, USB, etc.)
|
||||
- `Connector_Generic.kicad_sym` - Generic connectors
|
||||
- `Transistor_BJT.kicad_sym` - Bipolar transistors
|
||||
- `Transistor_FET.kicad_sym` - MOSFETs
|
||||
- `Amplifier_Operational.kicad_sym` - Op-amps
|
||||
- `Regulator_Linear.kicad_sym` - Voltage regulators
|
||||
- `MCU_*.kicad_sym` - Microcontrollers
|
||||
- `Interface_*.kicad_sym` - Interface ICs
|
||||
- ... 100+ more libraries
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Implementation Strategy
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 1: Library Discovery & Indexing
|
||||
|
||||
**Goal:** Build an index of all available symbols and their locations
|
||||
|
||||
**Implementation:**
|
||||
|
||||
```python
|
||||
class SymbolLibraryManager:
|
||||
def __init__(self):
|
||||
self.library_paths = []
|
||||
self.symbol_index = {} # {"Device:R": "/path/to/Device.kicad_sym", ...}
|
||||
|
||||
def discover_libraries(self):
|
||||
"""Find all KiCad symbol libraries on the system"""
|
||||
search_paths = [
|
||||
"/usr/share/kicad/symbols/",
|
||||
os.path.expanduser("~/.local/share/kicad/8.0/symbols/"),
|
||||
os.path.expanduser("~/.config/kicad/8.0/symbols/"),
|
||||
]
|
||||
|
||||
for search_path in search_paths:
|
||||
if os.path.exists(search_path):
|
||||
for lib_file in os.listdir(search_path):
|
||||
if lib_file.endswith('.kicad_sym'):
|
||||
self.library_paths.append(os.path.join(search_path, lib_file))
|
||||
|
||||
def index_symbols(self):
|
||||
"""Parse all libraries and build symbol index"""
|
||||
for lib_path in self.library_paths:
|
||||
lib_name = os.path.basename(lib_path).replace('.kicad_sym', '')
|
||||
symbols = self._parse_library(lib_path)
|
||||
|
||||
for symbol_name in symbols:
|
||||
full_name = f"{lib_name}:{symbol_name}"
|
||||
self.symbol_index[full_name] = {
|
||||
'library': lib_name,
|
||||
'library_path': lib_path,
|
||||
'symbol_name': symbol_name
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
def _parse_library(self, lib_path):
|
||||
"""Parse .kicad_sym file and extract symbol names"""
|
||||
# Use sexpdata (already a dependency of kicad-skip)
|
||||
import sexpdata
|
||||
|
||||
with open(lib_path, 'r') as f:
|
||||
data = sexpdata.load(f)
|
||||
|
||||
symbols = []
|
||||
for item in data[2:]: # Skip header
|
||||
if isinstance(item, list) and item[0] == Symbol('symbol'):
|
||||
symbol_name = item[1] # e.g., "Device:R"
|
||||
# Extract just the symbol part after ':'
|
||||
if ':' in symbol_name:
|
||||
symbol_name = symbol_name.split(':')[1]
|
||||
symbols.append(symbol_name)
|
||||
|
||||
return symbols
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 2: Dynamic Symbol Injection
|
||||
|
||||
**Goal:** Load symbol definition from library file and inject into schematic
|
||||
|
||||
**Challenge:** kicad-skip works with loaded schematics, but we need to dynamically add symbols to the `lib_symbols` section.
|
||||
|
||||
**Solution:** Modify the schematic's S-expression data directly before loading with kicad-skip:
|
||||
|
||||
```python
|
||||
def inject_symbol_into_schematic(schematic_path, library_path, symbol_name):
|
||||
"""
|
||||
1. Read schematic S-expression
|
||||
2. Read library S-expression
|
||||
3. Extract symbol definition from library
|
||||
4. Inject into schematic's lib_symbols section
|
||||
5. Save modified schematic
|
||||
6. Reload with kicad-skip
|
||||
"""
|
||||
import sexpdata
|
||||
|
||||
# Load schematic
|
||||
with open(schematic_path, 'r') as f:
|
||||
sch_data = sexpdata.load(f)
|
||||
|
||||
# Load library
|
||||
with open(library_path, 'r') as f:
|
||||
lib_data = sexpdata.load(f)
|
||||
|
||||
# Find symbol definition in library
|
||||
symbol_def = None
|
||||
for item in lib_data[2:]:
|
||||
if isinstance(item, list) and item[0] == Symbol('symbol'):
|
||||
if symbol_name in str(item[1]):
|
||||
symbol_def = item
|
||||
break
|
||||
|
||||
if not symbol_def:
|
||||
raise ValueError(f"Symbol {symbol_name} not found in {library_path}")
|
||||
|
||||
# Find lib_symbols section in schematic
|
||||
lib_symbols_index = None
|
||||
for i, item in enumerate(sch_data):
|
||||
if isinstance(item, list) and item[0] == Symbol('lib_symbols'):
|
||||
lib_symbols_index = i
|
||||
break
|
||||
|
||||
# Inject symbol definition
|
||||
if lib_symbols_index:
|
||||
sch_data[lib_symbols_index].append(symbol_def)
|
||||
|
||||
# Save modified schematic
|
||||
with open(schematic_path, 'w') as f:
|
||||
sexpdata.dump(sch_data, f)
|
||||
|
||||
# Reload with kicad-skip
|
||||
return Schematic(schematic_path)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 3: Template Instance Creation
|
||||
|
||||
**Goal:** Create offscreen template instances that can be cloned
|
||||
|
||||
**After injection:** Symbol definition is in `lib_symbols`, but we need an instance to clone from:
|
||||
|
||||
```python
|
||||
def create_template_instance(schematic, library_name, symbol_name):
|
||||
"""
|
||||
Create an offscreen template instance that can be cloned
|
||||
Similar to our current _TEMPLATE_R approach
|
||||
"""
|
||||
# This requires directly manipulating the S-expression
|
||||
# Add a symbol instance at offscreen position with special reference
|
||||
|
||||
template_ref = f"_TEMPLATE_{library_name}_{symbol_name}"
|
||||
|
||||
# Create symbol instance (S-expression)
|
||||
symbol_instance = [
|
||||
Symbol('symbol'),
|
||||
[Symbol('lib_id'), f"{library_name}:{symbol_name}"],
|
||||
[Symbol('at'), -100, -100 - (len(schematic.symbol) * 10), 0],
|
||||
[Symbol('unit'), 1],
|
||||
[Symbol('in_bom'), Symbol('no')],
|
||||
[Symbol('on_board'), Symbol('no')],
|
||||
[Symbol('dnp'), Symbol('yes')],
|
||||
[Symbol('uuid'), str(uuid.uuid4())],
|
||||
[Symbol('property'), "Reference", template_ref, ...],
|
||||
# ... more properties
|
||||
]
|
||||
|
||||
# Inject into schematic and reload
|
||||
# ... (similar to inject_symbol_into_schematic)
|
||||
|
||||
return template_ref
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 4: User-Facing API
|
||||
|
||||
**Goal:** Simple interface for users to add any KiCad symbol
|
||||
|
||||
**New MCP Tool: `add_schematic_component_dynamic`**
|
||||
|
||||
```python
|
||||
def add_schematic_component_dynamic(params):
|
||||
"""
|
||||
Add component by library:symbol notation
|
||||
|
||||
Example:
|
||||
{
|
||||
"library": "Device",
|
||||
"symbol": "R",
|
||||
"reference": "R1",
|
||||
"value": "10k",
|
||||
"x": 100,
|
||||
"y": 100
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
OR using full notation:
|
||||
{
|
||||
"lib_symbol": "Device:R", # Full notation
|
||||
"reference": "R1",
|
||||
...
|
||||
}
|
||||
"""
|
||||
lib_symbol = params.get('lib_symbol') or f"{params['library']}:{params['symbol']}"
|
||||
|
||||
# 1. Check if symbol is already in schematic's lib_symbols
|
||||
# 2. If not, inject it from library file
|
||||
# 3. Create template instance if needed
|
||||
# 4. Clone template and set properties
|
||||
|
||||
return {"success": True, "reference": params['reference']}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Advantages Over Template Approach
|
||||
|
||||
### ✅ Unlimited Symbol Access
|
||||
|
||||
- Access to ~10,000+ standard KiCad symbols
|
||||
- Support for custom user libraries
|
||||
- Support for 3rd-party libraries (JLCPCB, Espressif, etc.)
|
||||
|
||||
### ✅ No Maintenance Required
|
||||
|
||||
- Template doesn't need updates for new component types
|
||||
- Automatically supports new KiCad library additions
|
||||
- Works with custom symbol libraries
|
||||
|
||||
### ✅ Better User Experience
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
User: "Add an STM32F103C8T6 microcontroller at position 100,100"
|
||||
AI: *Searches symbol index*
|
||||
*Finds MCU_ST_STM32F1:STM32F103C8Tx*
|
||||
*Loads from library*
|
||||
*Injects into schematic*
|
||||
*Places component*
|
||||
✓ Done!
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### ✅ Flexible Symbol Search
|
||||
|
||||
```python
|
||||
# Find all resistors
|
||||
symbols = lib_manager.search_symbols(query="resistor")
|
||||
# Returns: ["Device:R", "Device:R_Small", "Device:R_Network", ...]
|
||||
|
||||
# Find all STM32 MCUs
|
||||
symbols = lib_manager.search_symbols(query="STM32", library="MCU_ST_STM32F1")
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Challenges & Mitigations
|
||||
|
||||
### Challenge 1: S-expression Manipulation Complexity
|
||||
|
||||
**Problem:** Directly manipulating S-expression data is error-prone
|
||||
|
||||
**Mitigation:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Use `sexpdata` library (already a dependency)
|
||||
- Create helper functions for common operations
|
||||
- Add comprehensive validation and error handling
|
||||
- Extensive testing with various symbol types
|
||||
|
||||
### Challenge 2: Performance
|
||||
|
||||
**Problem:** Loading/reloading schematics after injection could be slow
|
||||
|
||||
**Mitigation:**
|
||||
|
||||
- **Cache loaded symbols**: Once injected, symbol stays in schematic
|
||||
- **Batch injection**: Inject multiple symbols at once
|
||||
- **Lazy loading**: Only inject symbols when first used
|
||||
|
||||
### Challenge 3: Symbol Compatibility
|
||||
|
||||
**Problem:** Some symbols may have complex pin configurations or multiple units
|
||||
|
||||
**Mitigation:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Start with simple 2-pin passives (R, C, L)
|
||||
- Gradually add support for multi-pin ICs
|
||||
- Handle multi-unit symbols (gates, OpAmp sections) explicitly
|
||||
- Document supported symbol types
|
||||
|
||||
### Challenge 4: Library Version Compatibility
|
||||
|
||||
**Problem:** KiCad symbol format may change between versions
|
||||
|
||||
**Mitigation:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Parse KiCad version from library files
|
||||
- Version-specific handling if needed
|
||||
- Fallback to template approach for unsupported formats
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Implementation Phases
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase A: Proof of Concept (1-2 weeks)
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] Create `SymbolLibraryManager` class
|
||||
- [ ] Implement library discovery (Linux paths only)
|
||||
- [ ] Implement symbol indexing
|
||||
- [ ] Test with Device.kicad_sym (R, C, L)
|
||||
- [ ] Implement basic S-expression injection
|
||||
- [ ] Test end-to-end with simple components
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase B: Core Functionality (2-3 weeks)
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] Cross-platform library discovery (Windows, macOS)
|
||||
- [ ] Symbol search functionality
|
||||
- [ ] Template instance creation automation
|
||||
- [ ] Multi-pin component support
|
||||
- [ ] Error handling and validation
|
||||
- [ ] Unit tests for all operations
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase C: MCP Integration (1 week)
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] Create `add_schematic_component_dynamic` tool
|
||||
- [ ] Update `search_symbols` to use library index
|
||||
- [ ] Add `list_available_symbols` tool
|
||||
- [ ] Add `list_symbol_libraries` tool
|
||||
- [ ] Documentation and examples
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase D: Advanced Features (2-3 weeks)
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] Multi-unit symbol support (e.g., quad OpAmps)
|
||||
- [ ] Custom library registration
|
||||
- [ ] Symbol caching and optimization
|
||||
- [ ] 3rd-party library support (JLCPCB, etc.)
|
||||
- [ ] Symbol preview generation
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Migration Strategy
|
||||
|
||||
### Backward Compatibility
|
||||
|
||||
Keep template-based approach as fallback:
|
||||
|
||||
```python
|
||||
def add_schematic_component(params):
|
||||
"""Smart component addition with fallback"""
|
||||
# Try dynamic loading first
|
||||
try:
|
||||
if 'library' in params or 'lib_symbol' in params:
|
||||
return add_schematic_component_dynamic(params)
|
||||
except Exception as e:
|
||||
logger.warning(f"Dynamic loading failed: {e}, falling back to template")
|
||||
|
||||
# Fallback to template-based
|
||||
return add_schematic_component_template(params)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Gradual Rollout
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Week 1-2:** Implement basic dynamic loading
|
||||
2. **Week 3-4:** Test with power users, gather feedback
|
||||
3. **Week 5-6:** Make dynamic loading the default
|
||||
4. **Week 7+:** Deprecate template-only approach (keep as fallback)
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Success Criteria
|
||||
|
||||
### Must Have
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] Load symbols from Device.kicad_sym (passives)
|
||||
- [ ] Support R, C, L, D, LED (5 core types)
|
||||
- [ ] Cross-platform library discovery
|
||||
- [ ] Proper error handling
|
||||
|
||||
### Should Have
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] Support for all Device.kicad_sym symbols (~50 symbols)
|
||||
- [ ] Support for Connector.kicad_sym symbols
|
||||
- [ ] Symbol search by name/keyword
|
||||
- [ ] Performance: < 1 second per symbol injection
|
||||
|
||||
### Nice to Have
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] Support for all standard libraries (~10,000 symbols)
|
||||
- [ ] Multi-unit symbol support
|
||||
- [ ] Custom library registration
|
||||
- [ ] Symbol preview/documentation
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Risk Assessment
|
||||
|
||||
| Risk | Probability | Impact | Mitigation |
|
||||
| ------------------------------- | ----------- | ------ | ------------------------------------------------ |
|
||||
| S-expression parsing complexity | High | High | Use proven `sexpdata` library, extensive testing |
|
||||
| Performance degradation | Medium | Medium | Implement caching, lazy loading |
|
||||
| KiCad version incompatibility | Low | High | Version detection, format validation |
|
||||
| Template fallback breaks | Low | Medium | Maintain template approach in parallel |
|
||||
| User confusion | Medium | Low | Clear documentation, gradual rollout |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Conclusion
|
||||
|
||||
Dynamic library loading is **feasible and highly beneficial** for the schematic workflow. While the template-based approach (Option 1) provides immediate value with 13 component types, Option 2 would:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Eliminate the 13-component limitation**
|
||||
2. **Provide access to 10,000+ KiCad symbols**
|
||||
3. **Remove manual template maintenance**
|
||||
4. **Enable true "natural language PCB design"**
|
||||
|
||||
**Recommendation:**
|
||||
|
||||
- ✅ **Keep Option 1 (expanded template) for immediate use**
|
||||
- ✅ **Implement Option 2 (dynamic loading) over 6-8 weeks**
|
||||
- ✅ **Maintain template fallback for compatibility**
|
||||
|
||||
This gives users immediate value while we build the robust long-term solution.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## References
|
||||
|
||||
- [KiCad File Formats Documentation](https://dev-docs.kicad.org/en/file-formats/)
|
||||
- [kicad-skip GitHub](https://github.com/mvnmgrx/kicad-skip)
|
||||
- [sexpdata Python Library](https://github.com/jd-boyd/sexpdata)
|
||||
- [KiCad Symbol Library Format Spec](https://dev-docs.kicad.org/en/file-formats/sexpr-intro/)
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,390 +1,413 @@
|
||||
# Dynamic Symbol Loading - Implementation Status
|
||||
|
||||
**Date:** 2026-01-10
|
||||
**Status:** Phase A-C - ✅ **COMPLETE AND PRODUCTION-READY!**
|
||||
|
||||
## 🚀 BREAKTHROUGH: Full MCP Integration Complete!
|
||||
|
||||
We went from **planning** to **full production integration** in a single session!
|
||||
|
||||
**Phase A** (Proof of Concept): ✅ Complete - Core dynamic loading works
|
||||
**Phase B** (Core Functionality): ✅ ~60% Complete - Cross-platform, caching working
|
||||
**Phase C** (MCP Integration): ✅ **COMPLETE!** - Fully integrated through MCP interface
|
||||
|
||||
The dynamic symbol loading is now **FULLY OPERATIONAL** and accessible through the MCP interface!
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## What's Working (Core Functionality)
|
||||
|
||||
### ✅ Symbol Extraction
|
||||
- Parse `.kicad_sym` library files using S-expression parser
|
||||
- Extract specific symbol definitions by name
|
||||
- Cache parsed libraries for performance
|
||||
- Tested with Device.kicad_sym (533 symbols)
|
||||
|
||||
### ✅ S-Expression Manipulation
|
||||
- Load schematic files as S-expression trees
|
||||
- Inject symbol definitions into `lib_symbols` section
|
||||
- Preserve schematic structure and formatting
|
||||
- Write modified schematics back to disk
|
||||
|
||||
### ✅ Template Instance Creation
|
||||
- Create offscreen template instances at negative Y coordinates
|
||||
- Generate unique UUIDs for each template
|
||||
- Set proper properties (Reference, Value, Footprint, Datasheet)
|
||||
- Templates marked as: `in_bom: no`, `on_board: no`, `dnp: yes`
|
||||
|
||||
### ✅ Component Cloning
|
||||
- kicad-skip successfully clones from dynamic templates
|
||||
- Components inherit symbol structure from injected definitions
|
||||
- Properties can be modified after cloning
|
||||
- Full integration with existing ComponentManager
|
||||
|
||||
### ✅ Cross-Platform Library Discovery
|
||||
- Linux: `/usr/share/kicad/symbols`, `~/.local/share/kicad/*/symbols`
|
||||
- Windows: `C:/Program Files/KiCad/*/share/kicad/symbols`
|
||||
- macOS: `/Applications/KiCad/KiCad.app/Contents/SharedSupport/symbols`
|
||||
- Environment variable support: `KICAD9_SYMBOL_DIR`, etc.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Test Results
|
||||
|
||||
### End-to-End Test (Successful)
|
||||
|
||||
**Test:** Load 5 symbols dynamically and create components
|
||||
|
||||
```python
|
||||
Symbols Tested:
|
||||
- Device:R ✓ Injected, template created, cloned successfully
|
||||
- Device:C ✓ Injected, template created, cloned successfully
|
||||
- Device:LED ✓ Injected, template created, cloned successfully
|
||||
- Device:L ✓ Injected, template created, cloned successfully
|
||||
- Device:D ✓ Injected, template created, cloned successfully
|
||||
|
||||
Results:
|
||||
✓ All 5 symbols extracted from Device.kicad_sym
|
||||
✓ All 5 symbol definitions injected into schematic
|
||||
✓ All 5 template instances created
|
||||
✓ kicad-skip loaded modified schematic without errors
|
||||
✓ Components successfully cloned from dynamic templates
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Performance Metrics
|
||||
|
||||
- **Library parsing:** ~0.3s for Device.kicad_sym (first time)
|
||||
- **Library parsing:** ~0.001s (cached)
|
||||
- **Symbol extraction:** <0.01s
|
||||
- **Symbol injection:** ~0.05s
|
||||
- **Template creation:** ~0.02s
|
||||
- **Total per symbol:** ~0.08s (first time), ~0.03s (cached)
|
||||
|
||||
**Conclusion:** Fast enough for real-time use!
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Code Structure
|
||||
|
||||
### New File: `python/commands/dynamic_symbol_loader.py`
|
||||
|
||||
**Class:** `DynamicSymbolLoader`
|
||||
|
||||
**Key Methods:**
|
||||
```python
|
||||
# Library Discovery
|
||||
find_kicad_symbol_libraries() -> List[Path]
|
||||
find_library_file(library_name: str) -> Optional[Path]
|
||||
|
||||
# Parsing & Extraction
|
||||
parse_library_file(library_path: Path) -> List # Returns S-expression
|
||||
extract_symbol_definition(library_path: Path, symbol_name: str) -> Optional[List]
|
||||
|
||||
# Injection & Template Creation
|
||||
inject_symbol_into_schematic(schematic_path: Path, library: str, symbol: str) -> bool
|
||||
create_template_instance(schematic_path: Path, library: str, symbol: str) -> str
|
||||
|
||||
# Complete Workflow
|
||||
load_symbol_dynamically(schematic_path: Path, library: str, symbol: str) -> str
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Caching:**
|
||||
- `library_cache`: Parsed library files (path → S-expression data)
|
||||
- `symbol_cache`: Extracted symbols (lib:symbol → symbol definition)
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## What's NOT Yet Done (Integration Layer)
|
||||
|
||||
### ⏳ MCP Tool Integration
|
||||
- Need to create `add_schematic_component_dynamic` MCP tool
|
||||
- Wire dynamic loader through MCP interface (has schematic path)
|
||||
- Update existing `add_schematic_component` to auto-detect and use dynamic loading
|
||||
|
||||
### ⏳ Smart Symbol Discovery
|
||||
- Automatic library detection from component type
|
||||
- Search across all libraries for symbol names
|
||||
- Fuzzy matching for symbol names
|
||||
|
||||
### ⏳ Advanced Features
|
||||
- Multi-unit symbol support (e.g., quad op-amps)
|
||||
- Pin configuration handling
|
||||
- Custom library registration
|
||||
- Symbol preview generation
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Technical Challenges Solved
|
||||
|
||||
### Challenge 1: S-Expression Parsing
|
||||
**Problem:** KiCad files use Lisp-style S-expressions, complex to parse
|
||||
**Solution:** Used `sexpdata` library (already a dependency of kicad-skip)
|
||||
**Result:** ✅ Robust parsing with proper handling of nested structures
|
||||
|
||||
### Challenge 2: Symbol Structure Complexity
|
||||
**Problem:** Symbols have complex nested structure with multiple sub-symbols
|
||||
**Solution:** Extract entire symbol tree as-is, inject without modification
|
||||
**Result:** ✅ Preserves all symbol details (graphics, pins, properties)
|
||||
|
||||
### Challenge 3: kicad-skip Integration
|
||||
**Problem:** kicad-skip can only clone existing symbols, can't create from scratch
|
||||
**Solution:** Inject symbol into lib_symbols, create template instance, then clone
|
||||
**Result:** ✅ Seamless integration, kicad-skip unaware of dynamic loading
|
||||
|
||||
### Challenge 4: Schematic File Path Access
|
||||
**Problem:** kicad-skip Schematic object doesn't expose file path
|
||||
**Solution:** Pass schematic path explicitly at MCP interface layer
|
||||
**Result:** ⏳ Workaround identified, integration pending
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Example Usage (Current)
|
||||
|
||||
### Direct Python Usage
|
||||
|
||||
```python
|
||||
from commands.dynamic_symbol_loader import DynamicSymbolLoader
|
||||
from pathlib import Path
|
||||
|
||||
# Initialize loader
|
||||
loader = DynamicSymbolLoader()
|
||||
|
||||
# Load a symbol dynamically
|
||||
schematic_path = Path("/path/to/project.kicad_sch")
|
||||
template_ref = loader.load_symbol_dynamically(
|
||||
schematic_path,
|
||||
library_name="Device",
|
||||
symbol_name="R"
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
# Now use template_ref with kicad-skip to clone components
|
||||
# template_ref will be something like "_TEMPLATE_Device_R"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Future MCP Tool Usage
|
||||
|
||||
```typescript
|
||||
// This is what it WILL look like after integration:
|
||||
|
||||
await mcpServer.callTool("add_schematic_component_dynamic", {
|
||||
library: "MCU_ST_STM32F1",
|
||||
symbol: "STM32F103C8Tx",
|
||||
reference: "U1",
|
||||
x: 100,
|
||||
y: 100,
|
||||
footprint: "Package_QFP:LQFP-48_7x7mm_P0.5mm"
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
// The tool will:
|
||||
// 1. Check if symbol exists in static templates (no)
|
||||
// 2. Dynamically load from MCU_ST_STM32F1.kicad_sym
|
||||
// 3. Inject symbol definition
|
||||
// 4. Create template instance
|
||||
// 5. Clone to create actual component
|
||||
// 6. Set properties (reference, position, footprint)
|
||||
// All of this happens AUTOMATICALLY!
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Comparison: Before vs After
|
||||
|
||||
| Feature | Static Templates (Current) | Dynamic Loading (New) |
|
||||
|---------|---------------------------|----------------------|
|
||||
| **Available Symbols** | 13 types | ~10,000+ types |
|
||||
| **Maintenance** | Manual template updates | Zero maintenance |
|
||||
| **Custom Symbols** | Not supported | Fully supported |
|
||||
| **3rd Party Libs** | Not supported | Fully supported |
|
||||
| **Setup Time** | Pre-created templates | On-demand loading |
|
||||
| **Performance** | Instant (pre-loaded) | ~80ms first time, ~30ms cached |
|
||||
| **Flexibility** | Limited to template list | Any .kicad_sym file |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Phase Progress
|
||||
|
||||
### ✅ Phase A: Proof of Concept (COMPLETE)
|
||||
- [x] Create `DynamicSymbolLoader` class
|
||||
- [x] Implement library discovery (Linux paths)
|
||||
- [x] Implement symbol indexing
|
||||
- [x] Test with Device.kicad_sym (R, C, L)
|
||||
- [x] Implement basic S-expression injection
|
||||
- [x] Test end-to-end with simple components
|
||||
|
||||
**Time Estimate:** 1-2 weeks
|
||||
**Actual Time:** 4 hours! 🎉
|
||||
|
||||
### ⏳ Phase B: Core Functionality (IN PROGRESS)
|
||||
- [ ] Cross-platform library discovery (Windows, macOS)
|
||||
- [ ] Symbol search functionality
|
||||
- [ ] Template instance creation automation
|
||||
- [ ] Multi-pin component support
|
||||
- [ ] Error handling and validation
|
||||
- [ ] Unit tests for all operations
|
||||
|
||||
**Time Estimate:** 2-3 weeks
|
||||
**Progress:** 25% (cross-platform discovery done)
|
||||
|
||||
### ✅ Phase C: MCP Integration (COMPLETE!)
|
||||
- [x] Integrate dynamic loading into `add_schematic_component` MCP handler
|
||||
- [x] Implement save → inject → reload → clone orchestration
|
||||
- [x] Add schematic_path parameter throughout component chain
|
||||
- [x] Smart detection of when dynamic loading is needed
|
||||
- [x] Proper error handling and fallback to static templates
|
||||
- [x] End-to-end integration testing (100% passing!)
|
||||
|
||||
**Time Estimate:** 1 week
|
||||
**Actual Time:** 2 hours! 🎉
|
||||
**Status:** PRODUCTION READY!
|
||||
|
||||
**What Works Now:**
|
||||
- ✅ Users can add ANY symbol from KiCad libraries via MCP interface
|
||||
- ✅ Automatic detection and dynamic loading
|
||||
- ✅ Seamless fallback to static templates
|
||||
- ✅ Response includes dynamic_loading_used flag and symbol_source info
|
||||
- ✅ Compatible with all existing MCP clients
|
||||
|
||||
### ⏸️ Phase D: Advanced Features (PENDING)
|
||||
- [ ] Multi-unit symbol support (e.g., quad OpAmps)
|
||||
- [ ] Custom library registration
|
||||
- [ ] Symbol caching and optimization
|
||||
- [ ] 3rd-party library support (JLCPCB, etc.)
|
||||
- [ ] Symbol preview generation
|
||||
|
||||
**Time Estimate:** 2-3 weeks
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Next Immediate Steps
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Wire Through MCP Interface** (2-3 hours)
|
||||
- Update `python/kicad_interface.py` to pass schematic path
|
||||
- Create wrapper function that combines dynamic loading + cloning
|
||||
- Test with MCP client
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Create MCP Tool** (1-2 hours)
|
||||
- Define `add_schematic_component_dynamic` tool schema
|
||||
- Register in tool registry
|
||||
- Add to documentation
|
||||
|
||||
3. **Integration Testing** (1-2 hours)
|
||||
- Test with Claude Desktop/Cline
|
||||
- Test with complex symbols (ICs, connectors)
|
||||
- Verify error handling
|
||||
|
||||
**Total Time to Full Integration:** ~6 hours
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Success Metrics
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase A Metrics (All Achieved ✅)
|
||||
- [x] Load symbols from Device.kicad_sym (passives)
|
||||
- [x] Support R, C, L, D, LED (5 core types)
|
||||
- [x] Cross-platform library discovery
|
||||
- [x] Proper error handling
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase B Metrics (Target)
|
||||
- [ ] Support for all Device.kicad_sym symbols (~500 symbols)
|
||||
- [ ] Support for Connector.kicad_sym symbols
|
||||
- [ ] Symbol search by name/keyword
|
||||
- [ ] Performance: < 1 second per symbol injection
|
||||
|
||||
### Overall Success Criteria
|
||||
- [ ] Access to all standard libraries (~10,000 symbols)
|
||||
- [ ] Works on Linux, Windows, macOS
|
||||
- [ ] <100ms latency for cached symbols
|
||||
- [ ] Zero template maintenance required
|
||||
- [ ] Backward compatible with static templates
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Risks & Mitigations
|
||||
|
||||
| Risk | Status | Mitigation |
|
||||
|------|--------|------------|
|
||||
| S-expression complexity | ✅ RESOLVED | Used proven sexpdata library |
|
||||
| Performance degradation | ✅ RESOLVED | Caching works great (<30ms cached) |
|
||||
| KiCad version compatibility | ⚠️ TESTING | Version detection, format validation |
|
||||
| Template fallback breaks | ✅ PREVENTED | Maintained static templates in parallel |
|
||||
| Integration complexity | ⏳ IN PROGRESS | Clean separation of concerns |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Conclusion
|
||||
|
||||
**We did it!** The core dynamic symbol loading is **fully functional**. This is a game-changer for the KiCAD MCP Server:
|
||||
|
||||
- ✅ No more 13-component limitation
|
||||
- ✅ Access to thousands of symbols
|
||||
- ✅ Zero template maintenance
|
||||
- ✅ Production-ready performance
|
||||
|
||||
**The hardest part is DONE.** What remains is integration work (wiring through MCP interface), which is straightforward plumbing.
|
||||
|
||||
**Estimated time to full production deployment:** 6-8 hours of integration work.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 🎯 MCP Integration Test Results (2026-01-10)
|
||||
|
||||
**Test:** Full MCP interface with dynamic symbol loading
|
||||
**Status:** ✅ **100% PASSING**
|
||||
|
||||
### Test Components
|
||||
|
||||
| Component | Type | Library | Dynamic? | Result |
|
||||
|-----------|------|---------|----------|--------|
|
||||
| R1 | Resistor | Device | Yes | ✅ Added successfully |
|
||||
| C1 | Capacitor | Device | Yes | ✅ Added successfully |
|
||||
| BT1 | Battery | Device | **Yes** | ✅ **Dynamic load + clone** |
|
||||
| F1 | Fuse | Device | **Yes** | ✅ **Dynamic load + clone** |
|
||||
| T1 | Transformer_1P_1S | Device | **Yes** | ✅ **Dynamic load + clone** |
|
||||
|
||||
### Results Summary
|
||||
|
||||
- **Static templates:** 2/2 successful (R, C)
|
||||
- **Dynamic loading:** 3/3 successful (Battery, Fuse, Transformer)
|
||||
- **Total success rate:** 5/5 (100%)
|
||||
- **Templates created:** 5 (all persisted correctly)
|
||||
- **Reload orchestration:** Working perfectly
|
||||
- **Error handling:** No failures, all fallbacks untested (no errors!)
|
||||
|
||||
### What This Means
|
||||
|
||||
✅ Users can now add **ANY symbol from ~10,000 KiCad symbols** through the MCP interface!
|
||||
|
||||
✅ The system automatically:
|
||||
1. Detects if symbol needs dynamic loading
|
||||
2. Saves current schematic
|
||||
3. Injects symbol definition from library
|
||||
4. Creates template instance
|
||||
5. Reloads schematic
|
||||
6. Clones template to create component
|
||||
7. Saves final result
|
||||
|
||||
✅ **Zero configuration required** - just specify library and symbol name!
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
**Amazing progress! From planning to full production in one session!** 🚀 🎉
|
||||
# Dynamic Symbol Loading - Implementation Status
|
||||
|
||||
**Date:** 2026-01-10
|
||||
**Status:** Phase A-C - ✅ **COMPLETE AND PRODUCTION-READY!**
|
||||
|
||||
## 🚀 BREAKTHROUGH: Full MCP Integration Complete!
|
||||
|
||||
We went from **planning** to **full production integration** in a single session!
|
||||
|
||||
**Phase A** (Proof of Concept): ✅ Complete - Core dynamic loading works
|
||||
**Phase B** (Core Functionality): ✅ ~60% Complete - Cross-platform, caching working
|
||||
**Phase C** (MCP Integration): ✅ **COMPLETE!** - Fully integrated through MCP interface
|
||||
|
||||
The dynamic symbol loading is now **FULLY OPERATIONAL** and accessible through the MCP interface!
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## What's Working (Core Functionality)
|
||||
|
||||
### ✅ Symbol Extraction
|
||||
|
||||
- Parse `.kicad_sym` library files using S-expression parser
|
||||
- Extract specific symbol definitions by name
|
||||
- Cache parsed libraries for performance
|
||||
- Tested with Device.kicad_sym (533 symbols)
|
||||
|
||||
### ✅ S-Expression Manipulation
|
||||
|
||||
- Load schematic files as S-expression trees
|
||||
- Inject symbol definitions into `lib_symbols` section
|
||||
- Preserve schematic structure and formatting
|
||||
- Write modified schematics back to disk
|
||||
|
||||
### ✅ Template Instance Creation
|
||||
|
||||
- Create offscreen template instances at negative Y coordinates
|
||||
- Generate unique UUIDs for each template
|
||||
- Set proper properties (Reference, Value, Footprint, Datasheet)
|
||||
- Templates marked as: `in_bom: no`, `on_board: no`, `dnp: yes`
|
||||
|
||||
### ✅ Component Cloning
|
||||
|
||||
- kicad-skip successfully clones from dynamic templates
|
||||
- Components inherit symbol structure from injected definitions
|
||||
- Properties can be modified after cloning
|
||||
- Full integration with existing ComponentManager
|
||||
|
||||
### ✅ Cross-Platform Library Discovery
|
||||
|
||||
- Linux: `/usr/share/kicad/symbols`, `~/.local/share/kicad/*/symbols`
|
||||
- Windows: `C:/Program Files/KiCad/*/share/kicad/symbols`
|
||||
- macOS: `/Applications/KiCad/KiCad.app/Contents/SharedSupport/symbols`
|
||||
- Environment variable support: `KICAD9_SYMBOL_DIR`, etc.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Test Results
|
||||
|
||||
### End-to-End Test (Successful)
|
||||
|
||||
**Test:** Load 5 symbols dynamically and create components
|
||||
|
||||
```python
|
||||
Symbols Tested:
|
||||
- Device:R ✓ Injected, template created, cloned successfully
|
||||
- Device:C ✓ Injected, template created, cloned successfully
|
||||
- Device:LED ✓ Injected, template created, cloned successfully
|
||||
- Device:L ✓ Injected, template created, cloned successfully
|
||||
- Device:D ✓ Injected, template created, cloned successfully
|
||||
|
||||
Results:
|
||||
✓ All 5 symbols extracted from Device.kicad_sym
|
||||
✓ All 5 symbol definitions injected into schematic
|
||||
✓ All 5 template instances created
|
||||
✓ kicad-skip loaded modified schematic without errors
|
||||
✓ Components successfully cloned from dynamic templates
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Performance Metrics
|
||||
|
||||
- **Library parsing:** ~0.3s for Device.kicad_sym (first time)
|
||||
- **Library parsing:** ~0.001s (cached)
|
||||
- **Symbol extraction:** <0.01s
|
||||
- **Symbol injection:** ~0.05s
|
||||
- **Template creation:** ~0.02s
|
||||
- **Total per symbol:** ~0.08s (first time), ~0.03s (cached)
|
||||
|
||||
**Conclusion:** Fast enough for real-time use!
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Code Structure
|
||||
|
||||
### New File: `python/commands/dynamic_symbol_loader.py`
|
||||
|
||||
**Class:** `DynamicSymbolLoader`
|
||||
|
||||
**Key Methods:**
|
||||
|
||||
```python
|
||||
# Library Discovery
|
||||
find_kicad_symbol_libraries() -> List[Path]
|
||||
find_library_file(library_name: str) -> Optional[Path]
|
||||
|
||||
# Parsing & Extraction
|
||||
parse_library_file(library_path: Path) -> List # Returns S-expression
|
||||
extract_symbol_definition(library_path: Path, symbol_name: str) -> Optional[List]
|
||||
|
||||
# Injection & Template Creation
|
||||
inject_symbol_into_schematic(schematic_path: Path, library: str, symbol: str) -> bool
|
||||
create_template_instance(schematic_path: Path, library: str, symbol: str) -> str
|
||||
|
||||
# Complete Workflow
|
||||
load_symbol_dynamically(schematic_path: Path, library: str, symbol: str) -> str
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Caching:**
|
||||
|
||||
- `library_cache`: Parsed library files (path → S-expression data)
|
||||
- `symbol_cache`: Extracted symbols (lib:symbol → symbol definition)
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## What's NOT Yet Done (Integration Layer)
|
||||
|
||||
### ⏳ MCP Tool Integration
|
||||
|
||||
- Need to create `add_schematic_component_dynamic` MCP tool
|
||||
- Wire dynamic loader through MCP interface (has schematic path)
|
||||
- Update existing `add_schematic_component` to auto-detect and use dynamic loading
|
||||
|
||||
### ⏳ Smart Symbol Discovery
|
||||
|
||||
- Automatic library detection from component type
|
||||
- Search across all libraries for symbol names
|
||||
- Fuzzy matching for symbol names
|
||||
|
||||
### ⏳ Advanced Features
|
||||
|
||||
- Multi-unit symbol support (e.g., quad op-amps)
|
||||
- Pin configuration handling
|
||||
- Custom library registration
|
||||
- Symbol preview generation
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Technical Challenges Solved
|
||||
|
||||
### Challenge 1: S-Expression Parsing
|
||||
|
||||
**Problem:** KiCad files use Lisp-style S-expressions, complex to parse
|
||||
**Solution:** Used `sexpdata` library (already a dependency of kicad-skip)
|
||||
**Result:** ✅ Robust parsing with proper handling of nested structures
|
||||
|
||||
### Challenge 2: Symbol Structure Complexity
|
||||
|
||||
**Problem:** Symbols have complex nested structure with multiple sub-symbols
|
||||
**Solution:** Extract entire symbol tree as-is, inject without modification
|
||||
**Result:** ✅ Preserves all symbol details (graphics, pins, properties)
|
||||
|
||||
### Challenge 3: kicad-skip Integration
|
||||
|
||||
**Problem:** kicad-skip can only clone existing symbols, can't create from scratch
|
||||
**Solution:** Inject symbol into lib_symbols, create template instance, then clone
|
||||
**Result:** ✅ Seamless integration, kicad-skip unaware of dynamic loading
|
||||
|
||||
### Challenge 4: Schematic File Path Access
|
||||
|
||||
**Problem:** kicad-skip Schematic object doesn't expose file path
|
||||
**Solution:** Pass schematic path explicitly at MCP interface layer
|
||||
**Result:** ⏳ Workaround identified, integration pending
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Example Usage (Current)
|
||||
|
||||
### Direct Python Usage
|
||||
|
||||
```python
|
||||
from commands.dynamic_symbol_loader import DynamicSymbolLoader
|
||||
from pathlib import Path
|
||||
|
||||
# Initialize loader
|
||||
loader = DynamicSymbolLoader()
|
||||
|
||||
# Load a symbol dynamically
|
||||
schematic_path = Path("/path/to/project.kicad_sch")
|
||||
template_ref = loader.load_symbol_dynamically(
|
||||
schematic_path,
|
||||
library_name="Device",
|
||||
symbol_name="R"
|
||||
)
|
||||
|
||||
# Now use template_ref with kicad-skip to clone components
|
||||
# template_ref will be something like "_TEMPLATE_Device_R"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Future MCP Tool Usage
|
||||
|
||||
```typescript
|
||||
// This is what it WILL look like after integration:
|
||||
|
||||
await mcpServer.callTool("add_schematic_component_dynamic", {
|
||||
library: "MCU_ST_STM32F1",
|
||||
symbol: "STM32F103C8Tx",
|
||||
reference: "U1",
|
||||
x: 100,
|
||||
y: 100,
|
||||
footprint: "Package_QFP:LQFP-48_7x7mm_P0.5mm",
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
// The tool will:
|
||||
// 1. Check if symbol exists in static templates (no)
|
||||
// 2. Dynamically load from MCU_ST_STM32F1.kicad_sym
|
||||
// 3. Inject symbol definition
|
||||
// 4. Create template instance
|
||||
// 5. Clone to create actual component
|
||||
// 6. Set properties (reference, position, footprint)
|
||||
// All of this happens AUTOMATICALLY!
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Comparison: Before vs After
|
||||
|
||||
| Feature | Static Templates (Current) | Dynamic Loading (New) |
|
||||
| --------------------- | -------------------------- | ------------------------------ |
|
||||
| **Available Symbols** | 13 types | ~10,000+ types |
|
||||
| **Maintenance** | Manual template updates | Zero maintenance |
|
||||
| **Custom Symbols** | Not supported | Fully supported |
|
||||
| **3rd Party Libs** | Not supported | Fully supported |
|
||||
| **Setup Time** | Pre-created templates | On-demand loading |
|
||||
| **Performance** | Instant (pre-loaded) | ~80ms first time, ~30ms cached |
|
||||
| **Flexibility** | Limited to template list | Any .kicad_sym file |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Phase Progress
|
||||
|
||||
### ✅ Phase A: Proof of Concept (COMPLETE)
|
||||
|
||||
- [x] Create `DynamicSymbolLoader` class
|
||||
- [x] Implement library discovery (Linux paths)
|
||||
- [x] Implement symbol indexing
|
||||
- [x] Test with Device.kicad_sym (R, C, L)
|
||||
- [x] Implement basic S-expression injection
|
||||
- [x] Test end-to-end with simple components
|
||||
|
||||
**Time Estimate:** 1-2 weeks
|
||||
**Actual Time:** 4 hours! 🎉
|
||||
|
||||
### ⏳ Phase B: Core Functionality (IN PROGRESS)
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] Cross-platform library discovery (Windows, macOS)
|
||||
- [ ] Symbol search functionality
|
||||
- [ ] Template instance creation automation
|
||||
- [ ] Multi-pin component support
|
||||
- [ ] Error handling and validation
|
||||
- [ ] Unit tests for all operations
|
||||
|
||||
**Time Estimate:** 2-3 weeks
|
||||
**Progress:** 25% (cross-platform discovery done)
|
||||
|
||||
### ✅ Phase C: MCP Integration (COMPLETE!)
|
||||
|
||||
- [x] Integrate dynamic loading into `add_schematic_component` MCP handler
|
||||
- [x] Implement save → inject → reload → clone orchestration
|
||||
- [x] Add schematic_path parameter throughout component chain
|
||||
- [x] Smart detection of when dynamic loading is needed
|
||||
- [x] Proper error handling and fallback to static templates
|
||||
- [x] End-to-end integration testing (100% passing!)
|
||||
|
||||
**Time Estimate:** 1 week
|
||||
**Actual Time:** 2 hours! 🎉
|
||||
**Status:** PRODUCTION READY!
|
||||
|
||||
**What Works Now:**
|
||||
|
||||
- ✅ Users can add ANY symbol from KiCad libraries via MCP interface
|
||||
- ✅ Automatic detection and dynamic loading
|
||||
- ✅ Seamless fallback to static templates
|
||||
- ✅ Response includes dynamic_loading_used flag and symbol_source info
|
||||
- ✅ Compatible with all existing MCP clients
|
||||
|
||||
### ⏸️ Phase D: Advanced Features (PENDING)
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] Multi-unit symbol support (e.g., quad OpAmps)
|
||||
- [ ] Custom library registration
|
||||
- [ ] Symbol caching and optimization
|
||||
- [ ] 3rd-party library support (JLCPCB, etc.)
|
||||
- [ ] Symbol preview generation
|
||||
|
||||
**Time Estimate:** 2-3 weeks
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Next Immediate Steps
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Wire Through MCP Interface** (2-3 hours)
|
||||
- Update `python/kicad_interface.py` to pass schematic path
|
||||
- Create wrapper function that combines dynamic loading + cloning
|
||||
- Test with MCP client
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Create MCP Tool** (1-2 hours)
|
||||
- Define `add_schematic_component_dynamic` tool schema
|
||||
- Register in tool registry
|
||||
- Add to documentation
|
||||
|
||||
3. **Integration Testing** (1-2 hours)
|
||||
- Test with Claude Desktop/Cline
|
||||
- Test with complex symbols (ICs, connectors)
|
||||
- Verify error handling
|
||||
|
||||
**Total Time to Full Integration:** ~6 hours
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Success Metrics
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase A Metrics (All Achieved ✅)
|
||||
|
||||
- [x] Load symbols from Device.kicad_sym (passives)
|
||||
- [x] Support R, C, L, D, LED (5 core types)
|
||||
- [x] Cross-platform library discovery
|
||||
- [x] Proper error handling
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase B Metrics (Target)
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] Support for all Device.kicad_sym symbols (~500 symbols)
|
||||
- [ ] Support for Connector.kicad_sym symbols
|
||||
- [ ] Symbol search by name/keyword
|
||||
- [ ] Performance: < 1 second per symbol injection
|
||||
|
||||
### Overall Success Criteria
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] Access to all standard libraries (~10,000 symbols)
|
||||
- [ ] Works on Linux, Windows, macOS
|
||||
- [ ] <100ms latency for cached symbols
|
||||
- [ ] Zero template maintenance required
|
||||
- [ ] Backward compatible with static templates
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Risks & Mitigations
|
||||
|
||||
| Risk | Status | Mitigation |
|
||||
| --------------------------- | -------------- | --------------------------------------- |
|
||||
| S-expression complexity | ✅ RESOLVED | Used proven sexpdata library |
|
||||
| Performance degradation | ✅ RESOLVED | Caching works great (<30ms cached) |
|
||||
| KiCad version compatibility | ⚠️ TESTING | Version detection, format validation |
|
||||
| Template fallback breaks | ✅ PREVENTED | Maintained static templates in parallel |
|
||||
| Integration complexity | ⏳ IN PROGRESS | Clean separation of concerns |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Conclusion
|
||||
|
||||
**We did it!** The core dynamic symbol loading is **fully functional**. This is a game-changer for the KiCAD MCP Server:
|
||||
|
||||
- ✅ No more 13-component limitation
|
||||
- ✅ Access to thousands of symbols
|
||||
- ✅ Zero template maintenance
|
||||
- ✅ Production-ready performance
|
||||
|
||||
**The hardest part is DONE.** What remains is integration work (wiring through MCP interface), which is straightforward plumbing.
|
||||
|
||||
**Estimated time to full production deployment:** 6-8 hours of integration work.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 🎯 MCP Integration Test Results (2026-01-10)
|
||||
|
||||
**Test:** Full MCP interface with dynamic symbol loading
|
||||
**Status:** ✅ **100% PASSING**
|
||||
|
||||
### Test Components
|
||||
|
||||
| Component | Type | Library | Dynamic? | Result |
|
||||
| --------- | ----------------- | ------- | -------- | --------------------------- |
|
||||
| R1 | Resistor | Device | Yes | ✅ Added successfully |
|
||||
| C1 | Capacitor | Device | Yes | ✅ Added successfully |
|
||||
| BT1 | Battery | Device | **Yes** | ✅ **Dynamic load + clone** |
|
||||
| F1 | Fuse | Device | **Yes** | ✅ **Dynamic load + clone** |
|
||||
| T1 | Transformer_1P_1S | Device | **Yes** | ✅ **Dynamic load + clone** |
|
||||
|
||||
### Results Summary
|
||||
|
||||
- **Static templates:** 2/2 successful (R, C)
|
||||
- **Dynamic loading:** 3/3 successful (Battery, Fuse, Transformer)
|
||||
- **Total success rate:** 5/5 (100%)
|
||||
- **Templates created:** 5 (all persisted correctly)
|
||||
- **Reload orchestration:** Working perfectly
|
||||
- **Error handling:** No failures, all fallbacks untested (no errors!)
|
||||
|
||||
### What This Means
|
||||
|
||||
✅ Users can now add **ANY symbol from ~10,000 KiCad symbols** through the MCP interface!
|
||||
|
||||
✅ The system automatically:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Detects if symbol needs dynamic loading
|
||||
2. Saves current schematic
|
||||
3. Injects symbol definition from library
|
||||
4. Creates template instance
|
||||
5. Reloads schematic
|
||||
6. Clones template to create component
|
||||
7. Saves final result
|
||||
|
||||
✅ **Zero configuration required** - just specify library and symbol name!
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
**Amazing progress! From planning to full production in one session!** 🚀 🎉
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -1,477 +1,493 @@
|
||||
# KiCAD IPC API Migration Plan
|
||||
|
||||
**Status:** 📋 Planning
|
||||
**Target Completion:** Week 2-3 (November 1-8, 2025)
|
||||
**Priority:** 🔴 **CRITICAL** - Current SWIG API deprecated
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Executive Summary
|
||||
|
||||
The current KiCAD MCP Server uses SWIG-based Python bindings (`import pcbnew`) which are **deprecated as of KiCAD 9.0** and will be **removed in KiCAD 10.0**. We must migrate to the official **KiCAD IPC API** to future-proof the project.
|
||||
|
||||
### Why Migrate?
|
||||
|
||||
| SWIG API (Current) | IPC API (Future) |
|
||||
|-------------------|------------------|
|
||||
| ❌ Deprecated | ✅ Official & Supported |
|
||||
| ❌ Will be removed in KiCAD 10.0 | ✅ Long-term stability |
|
||||
| ❌ Python-only | ✅ Multi-language (Python, JS, etc.) |
|
||||
| ❌ Direct linking | ✅ Inter-process communication |
|
||||
| ⚠️ Synchronous only | ✅ Async support |
|
||||
| ⚠️ No versioning | ✅ Protocol Buffers versioning |
|
||||
|
||||
**Decision: Migrate immediately to avoid technical debt**
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## IPC API Overview
|
||||
|
||||
### Architecture
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
|
||||
│ TypeScript MCP Server (Node.js) │
|
||||
└──────────────────────┬──────────────────────────────────────┘
|
||||
│ JSON over stdin/stdout
|
||||
┌──────────────────────▼──────────────────────────────────────┐
|
||||
│ Python Interface Layer │
|
||||
│ ┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │
|
||||
│ │ KiCAD API Abstraction (NEW) │ │
|
||||
│ └────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ │
|
||||
└──────────────────────┬──────────────────────────────────────┘
|
||||
│ kicad-python library
|
||||
┌──────────────────────▼──────────────────────────────────────┐
|
||||
│ KiCAD IPC Server (Protocol Buffers) │
|
||||
│ Running inside KiCAD Process │
|
||||
└──────────────────────┬──────────────────────────────────────┘
|
||||
│ UNIX Sockets / Named Pipes
|
||||
┌──────────────────────▼──────────────────────────────────────┐
|
||||
│ KiCAD 9.0+ Application │
|
||||
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Key Differences
|
||||
|
||||
1. **KiCAD Must Be Running**
|
||||
- SWIG: Can run headless, no KiCAD GUI needed
|
||||
- IPC: Requires KiCAD running with IPC server enabled
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Communication Method**
|
||||
- SWIG: Direct Python module import
|
||||
- IPC: Socket-based RPC (Remote Procedure Call)
|
||||
|
||||
3. **API Structure**
|
||||
- SWIG: `board.SetSize(width, height)`
|
||||
- IPC: `kicad.get_board().set_size(width, height)`
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Migration Strategy
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 1: Research & Preparation (Days 1-2)
|
||||
|
||||
**Goals:**
|
||||
- Understand kicad-python library
|
||||
- Test IPC connection
|
||||
- Document API differences
|
||||
|
||||
**Tasks:**
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Install kicad-python
|
||||
pip install kicad-python>=0.5.0
|
||||
|
||||
# Test basic connection
|
||||
python3 << EOF
|
||||
from kicad import KiCad
|
||||
kicad = KiCad()
|
||||
print(f"Connected to KiCAD: {kicad.check_version()}")
|
||||
EOF
|
||||
|
||||
# Read official documentation
|
||||
# https://docs.kicad.org/kicad-python-main
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Deliverables:**
|
||||
- [ ] kicad-python installed and tested
|
||||
- [ ] Connection test script
|
||||
- [ ] API comparison document (SWIG vs IPC)
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 2: Abstraction Layer (Days 3-4)
|
||||
|
||||
**Goal:** Create an abstraction layer to support both APIs during transition
|
||||
|
||||
**File Structure:**
|
||||
```
|
||||
python/kicad_api/
|
||||
├── __init__.py
|
||||
├── base.py # Abstract base class
|
||||
├── ipc_backend.py # NEW: IPC API implementation
|
||||
├── swig_backend.py # Legacy SWIG implementation
|
||||
└── factory.py # Backend selector
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Abstract Interface:**
|
||||
```python
|
||||
# python/kicad_api/base.py
|
||||
from abc import ABC, abstractmethod
|
||||
from typing import Optional
|
||||
from pathlib import Path
|
||||
|
||||
class KiCADBackend(ABC):
|
||||
"""Abstract base class for KiCAD API backends"""
|
||||
|
||||
@abstractmethod
|
||||
def connect(self) -> bool:
|
||||
"""Connect to KiCAD"""
|
||||
pass
|
||||
|
||||
@abstractmethod
|
||||
def disconnect(self) -> None:
|
||||
"""Disconnect from KiCAD"""
|
||||
pass
|
||||
|
||||
@abstractmethod
|
||||
def is_connected(self) -> bool:
|
||||
"""Check if connected"""
|
||||
pass
|
||||
|
||||
@abstractmethod
|
||||
def create_project(self, path: Path, name: str) -> dict:
|
||||
"""Create a new KiCAD project"""
|
||||
pass
|
||||
|
||||
@abstractmethod
|
||||
def open_project(self, path: Path) -> dict:
|
||||
"""Open existing project"""
|
||||
pass
|
||||
|
||||
@abstractmethod
|
||||
def get_board(self) -> 'BoardAPI':
|
||||
"""Get board API"""
|
||||
pass
|
||||
|
||||
# ... more abstract methods
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**IPC Implementation:**
|
||||
```python
|
||||
# python/kicad_api/ipc_backend.py
|
||||
from kicad import KiCad
|
||||
from kicad_api.base import KiCADBackend
|
||||
|
||||
class IPCBackend(KiCADBackend):
|
||||
"""KiCAD IPC API backend"""
|
||||
|
||||
def __init__(self):
|
||||
self.kicad = None
|
||||
|
||||
def connect(self) -> bool:
|
||||
"""Connect to running KiCAD instance"""
|
||||
try:
|
||||
self.kicad = KiCad()
|
||||
# Verify connection
|
||||
version = self.kicad.check_version()
|
||||
logger.info(f"Connected to KiCAD via IPC: {version}")
|
||||
return True
|
||||
except Exception as e:
|
||||
logger.error(f"Failed to connect via IPC: {e}")
|
||||
return False
|
||||
|
||||
def create_project(self, path: Path, name: str) -> dict:
|
||||
"""Create project using IPC API"""
|
||||
# Implementation here
|
||||
pass
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Backend Factory:**
|
||||
```python
|
||||
# python/kicad_api/factory.py
|
||||
from typing import Optional
|
||||
from kicad_api.base import KiCADBackend
|
||||
from kicad_api.ipc_backend import IPCBackend
|
||||
from kicad_api.swig_backend import SWIGBackend
|
||||
|
||||
def create_backend(backend_type: Optional[str] = None) -> KiCADBackend:
|
||||
"""
|
||||
Create appropriate KiCAD backend
|
||||
|
||||
Args:
|
||||
backend_type: 'ipc', 'swig', or None for auto-detect
|
||||
|
||||
Returns:
|
||||
KiCADBackend instance
|
||||
"""
|
||||
if backend_type == 'ipc':
|
||||
return IPCBackend()
|
||||
elif backend_type == 'swig':
|
||||
return SWIGBackend()
|
||||
else:
|
||||
# Auto-detect: Try IPC first, fall back to SWIG
|
||||
try:
|
||||
backend = IPCBackend()
|
||||
if backend.connect():
|
||||
return backend
|
||||
except ImportError:
|
||||
pass
|
||||
|
||||
# Fall back to SWIG
|
||||
return SWIGBackend()
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Deliverables:**
|
||||
- [ ] Abstract base class defined
|
||||
- [ ] IPC backend implemented
|
||||
- [ ] SWIG backend (wrapper around existing code)
|
||||
- [ ] Factory with auto-detection
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 3: Port Core Modules (Days 5-8)
|
||||
|
||||
**Migration Order** (by complexity):
|
||||
|
||||
1. **project.py** (Simple - good starting point)
|
||||
- Create, open, save projects
|
||||
- Estimated: 2 hours
|
||||
|
||||
2. **board.py** (Medium - board properties)
|
||||
- Set size, layers, outline
|
||||
- Estimated: 4 hours
|
||||
|
||||
3. **component.py** (Complex - many operations)
|
||||
- Place, move, rotate, delete
|
||||
- Component arrays and alignment
|
||||
- Estimated: 8 hours
|
||||
|
||||
4. **routing.py** (Complex - trace routing)
|
||||
- Nets, traces, vias
|
||||
- Copper pours, differential pairs
|
||||
- Estimated: 8 hours
|
||||
|
||||
5. **design_rules.py** (Medium - DRC)
|
||||
- Set rules, run DRC
|
||||
- Estimated: 4 hours
|
||||
|
||||
6. **export.py** (Medium - file exports)
|
||||
- Gerber, PDF, SVG, 3D
|
||||
- Estimated: 4 hours
|
||||
|
||||
**Total Estimated Time: 30 hours (~4 days)**
|
||||
|
||||
**Migration Template:**
|
||||
```python
|
||||
# OLD (SWIG)
|
||||
import pcbnew
|
||||
board = pcbnew.LoadBoard(filename)
|
||||
board.SetBoardSize(width, height)
|
||||
|
||||
# NEW (IPC via abstraction)
|
||||
from kicad_api import create_backend
|
||||
backend = create_backend('ipc')
|
||||
backend.connect()
|
||||
board_api = backend.get_board()
|
||||
board_api.set_size(width, height)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Deliverables:**
|
||||
- [ ] project.py migrated
|
||||
- [ ] board.py migrated
|
||||
- [ ] component.py migrated
|
||||
- [ ] routing.py migrated
|
||||
- [ ] design_rules.py migrated
|
||||
- [ ] export.py migrated
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 4: Testing & Validation (Days 9-10)
|
||||
|
||||
**Testing Strategy:**
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Unit Tests**
|
||||
```python
|
||||
@pytest.mark.parametrize("backend_type", ["ipc", "swig"])
|
||||
def test_create_project(backend_type):
|
||||
backend = create_backend(backend_type)
|
||||
result = backend.create_project(Path("/tmp/test"), "TestProject")
|
||||
assert result["success"] is True
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Integration Tests**
|
||||
- Run side-by-side: IPC vs SWIG
|
||||
- Compare outputs for identical operations
|
||||
- Verify file compatibility
|
||||
|
||||
3. **Performance Benchmarks**
|
||||
```python
|
||||
# Measure: operations/second for each backend
|
||||
# Expected: IPC slightly slower due to IPC overhead
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Deliverables:**
|
||||
- [ ] 50+ unit tests passing for IPC backend
|
||||
- [ ] Side-by-side comparison tests
|
||||
- [ ] Performance benchmarks documented
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## API Comparison Reference
|
||||
|
||||
### Project Operations
|
||||
|
||||
| Operation | SWIG | IPC |
|
||||
|-----------|------|-----|
|
||||
| Create project | Custom file creation | `kicad.create_project()` |
|
||||
| Open project | `pcbnew.LoadBoard()` | `kicad.open_project()` |
|
||||
| Save project | `board.Save()` | `board.save()` |
|
||||
|
||||
### Board Operations
|
||||
|
||||
| Operation | SWIG | IPC |
|
||||
|-----------|------|-----|
|
||||
| Get board | `pcbnew.LoadBoard()` | `kicad.get_board()` |
|
||||
| Set size | `board.SetBoardSize()` | `board.set_size()` |
|
||||
| Add layer | `board.GetLayerCount()` | `board.layers.add()` |
|
||||
|
||||
### Component Operations
|
||||
|
||||
| Operation | SWIG | IPC |
|
||||
|-----------|------|-----|
|
||||
| Place component | `pcbnew.FOOTPRINT()` | `board.add_footprint()` |
|
||||
| Move component | `fp.SetPosition()` | `footprint.set_position()` |
|
||||
| Rotate component | `fp.SetOrientation()` | `footprint.set_rotation()` |
|
||||
|
||||
### Routing Operations
|
||||
|
||||
| Operation | SWIG | IPC |
|
||||
|-----------|------|-----|
|
||||
| Add net | `board.GetNetCount()` | `board.nets.add()` |
|
||||
| Route trace | `pcbnew.PCB_TRACK()` | `board.add_track()` |
|
||||
| Add via | `pcbnew.PCB_VIA()` | `board.add_via()` |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Configuration Changes
|
||||
|
||||
### Update requirements.txt
|
||||
|
||||
```diff
|
||||
+ # KiCAD IPC API (official Python bindings)
|
||||
+ kicad-python>=0.5.0
|
||||
|
||||
# Legacy SWIG support (for backward compatibility)
|
||||
kicad-skip>=0.1.0
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Environment Variables
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Enable IPC API in KiCAD preferences
|
||||
# Preferences > Plugins > Enable IPC API Server
|
||||
|
||||
# Set backend preference (optional)
|
||||
export KICAD_BACKEND=ipc # or 'swig' or 'auto'
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### User Migration Guide
|
||||
|
||||
Create `docs/MIGRATING_TO_IPC.md`:
|
||||
- How to enable IPC in KiCAD
|
||||
- What changes for users
|
||||
- Troubleshooting IPC connection issues
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Rollback Plan
|
||||
|
||||
If IPC migration fails:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Keep SWIG backend** - Already abstracted
|
||||
2. **Default to SWIG** - Change factory auto-detection
|
||||
3. **Document limitations** - Note that SWIG will be removed eventually
|
||||
4. **Plan retry** - Schedule IPC migration for later
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Success Criteria
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] ✅ All existing functionality works with IPC backend
|
||||
- [ ] ✅ Tests pass with both IPC and SWIG backends
|
||||
- [ ] ✅ Performance acceptable (< 20% slowdown vs SWIG)
|
||||
- [ ] ✅ Documentation updated
|
||||
- [ ] ✅ Migration guide created
|
||||
- [ ] ✅ User-facing tools work without changes
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Timeline
|
||||
|
||||
| Week | Days | Tasks |
|
||||
|------|------|-------|
|
||||
| **Week 2** | Mon-Tue | Research, install kicad-python, test connection |
|
||||
| | Wed-Thu | Build abstraction layer |
|
||||
| | Fri | Port project.py and board.py |
|
||||
| **Week 3** | Mon-Tue | Port component.py and routing.py |
|
||||
| | Wed | Port design_rules.py and export.py |
|
||||
| | Thu-Fri | Testing, validation, documentation |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Resources
|
||||
|
||||
- **Official Docs:** https://docs.kicad.org/kicad-python-main
|
||||
- **kicad-python PyPI:** https://pypi.org/project/kicad-python/
|
||||
- **IPC API Spec:** https://dev-docs.kicad.org/en/apis-and-binding/ipc-api/
|
||||
- **Protocol Buffers:** Used by IPC for message format
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Open Questions
|
||||
|
||||
1. **How to handle KiCAD not running?**
|
||||
- Option A: Auto-launch KiCAD in background
|
||||
- Option B: Require user to launch KiCAD first
|
||||
- Option C: Fall back to SWIG if IPC unavailable
|
||||
- **Decision: Option C for now, A later**
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Connection management**
|
||||
- Should we keep connection open or connect per-operation?
|
||||
- **Decision: Keep alive with reconnect logic**
|
||||
|
||||
3. **Performance vs reliability**
|
||||
- IPC has overhead but more stable
|
||||
- **Decision: Reliability > performance**
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Next Steps (This Week)
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Install kicad-python**
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
pip install kicad-python
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Test IPC connection**
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Launch KiCAD
|
||||
# Enable IPC in preferences
|
||||
python3 -c "from kicad import KiCad; k=KiCad(); print(k.check_version())"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
3. **Create abstraction layer structure**
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
mkdir -p python/kicad_api
|
||||
touch python/kicad_api/{__init__,base,ipc_backend,swig_backend,factory}.py
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
4. **Begin project.py migration**
|
||||
- Start with simplest module
|
||||
- Establish patterns for others
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
**Prepared by:** Claude Code
|
||||
**Last Updated:** October 25, 2025
|
||||
**Status:** 📋 Ready to execute
|
||||
# KiCAD IPC API Migration Plan
|
||||
|
||||
**Status:** 📋 Planning
|
||||
**Target Completion:** Week 2-3 (November 1-8, 2025)
|
||||
**Priority:** 🔴 **CRITICAL** - Current SWIG API deprecated
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Executive Summary
|
||||
|
||||
The current KiCAD MCP Server uses SWIG-based Python bindings (`import pcbnew`) which are **deprecated as of KiCAD 9.0** and will be **removed in KiCAD 10.0**. We must migrate to the official **KiCAD IPC API** to future-proof the project.
|
||||
|
||||
### Why Migrate?
|
||||
|
||||
| SWIG API (Current) | IPC API (Future) |
|
||||
| -------------------------------- | ------------------------------------ |
|
||||
| ❌ Deprecated | ✅ Official & Supported |
|
||||
| ❌ Will be removed in KiCAD 10.0 | ✅ Long-term stability |
|
||||
| ❌ Python-only | ✅ Multi-language (Python, JS, etc.) |
|
||||
| ❌ Direct linking | ✅ Inter-process communication |
|
||||
| ⚠️ Synchronous only | ✅ Async support |
|
||||
| ⚠️ No versioning | ✅ Protocol Buffers versioning |
|
||||
|
||||
**Decision: Migrate immediately to avoid technical debt**
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## IPC API Overview
|
||||
|
||||
### Architecture
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
|
||||
│ TypeScript MCP Server (Node.js) │
|
||||
└──────────────────────┬──────────────────────────────────────┘
|
||||
│ JSON over stdin/stdout
|
||||
┌──────────────────────▼──────────────────────────────────────┐
|
||||
│ Python Interface Layer │
|
||||
│ ┌────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐ │
|
||||
│ │ KiCAD API Abstraction (NEW) │ │
|
||||
│ └────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘ │
|
||||
└──────────────────────┬──────────────────────────────────────┘
|
||||
│ kicad-python library
|
||||
┌──────────────────────▼──────────────────────────────────────┐
|
||||
│ KiCAD IPC Server (Protocol Buffers) │
|
||||
│ Running inside KiCAD Process │
|
||||
└──────────────────────┬──────────────────────────────────────┘
|
||||
│ UNIX Sockets / Named Pipes
|
||||
┌──────────────────────▼──────────────────────────────────────┐
|
||||
│ KiCAD 9.0+ Application │
|
||||
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Key Differences
|
||||
|
||||
1. **KiCAD Must Be Running**
|
||||
- SWIG: Can run headless, no KiCAD GUI needed
|
||||
- IPC: Requires KiCAD running with IPC server enabled
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Communication Method**
|
||||
- SWIG: Direct Python module import
|
||||
- IPC: Socket-based RPC (Remote Procedure Call)
|
||||
|
||||
3. **API Structure**
|
||||
- SWIG: `board.SetSize(width, height)`
|
||||
- IPC: `kicad.get_board().set_size(width, height)`
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Migration Strategy
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 1: Research & Preparation (Days 1-2)
|
||||
|
||||
**Goals:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Understand kicad-python library
|
||||
- Test IPC connection
|
||||
- Document API differences
|
||||
|
||||
**Tasks:**
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Install kicad-python
|
||||
pip install kicad-python>=0.5.0
|
||||
|
||||
# Test basic connection
|
||||
python3 << EOF
|
||||
from kicad import KiCad
|
||||
kicad = KiCad()
|
||||
print(f"Connected to KiCAD: {kicad.check_version()}")
|
||||
EOF
|
||||
|
||||
# Read official documentation
|
||||
# https://docs.kicad.org/kicad-python-main
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Deliverables:**
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] kicad-python installed and tested
|
||||
- [ ] Connection test script
|
||||
- [ ] API comparison document (SWIG vs IPC)
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 2: Abstraction Layer (Days 3-4)
|
||||
|
||||
**Goal:** Create an abstraction layer to support both APIs during transition
|
||||
|
||||
**File Structure:**
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
python/kicad_api/
|
||||
├── __init__.py
|
||||
├── base.py # Abstract base class
|
||||
├── ipc_backend.py # NEW: IPC API implementation
|
||||
├── swig_backend.py # Legacy SWIG implementation
|
||||
└── factory.py # Backend selector
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Abstract Interface:**
|
||||
|
||||
```python
|
||||
# python/kicad_api/base.py
|
||||
from abc import ABC, abstractmethod
|
||||
from typing import Optional
|
||||
from pathlib import Path
|
||||
|
||||
class KiCADBackend(ABC):
|
||||
"""Abstract base class for KiCAD API backends"""
|
||||
|
||||
@abstractmethod
|
||||
def connect(self) -> bool:
|
||||
"""Connect to KiCAD"""
|
||||
pass
|
||||
|
||||
@abstractmethod
|
||||
def disconnect(self) -> None:
|
||||
"""Disconnect from KiCAD"""
|
||||
pass
|
||||
|
||||
@abstractmethod
|
||||
def is_connected(self) -> bool:
|
||||
"""Check if connected"""
|
||||
pass
|
||||
|
||||
@abstractmethod
|
||||
def create_project(self, path: Path, name: str) -> dict:
|
||||
"""Create a new KiCAD project"""
|
||||
pass
|
||||
|
||||
@abstractmethod
|
||||
def open_project(self, path: Path) -> dict:
|
||||
"""Open existing project"""
|
||||
pass
|
||||
|
||||
@abstractmethod
|
||||
def get_board(self) -> 'BoardAPI':
|
||||
"""Get board API"""
|
||||
pass
|
||||
|
||||
# ... more abstract methods
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**IPC Implementation:**
|
||||
|
||||
```python
|
||||
# python/kicad_api/ipc_backend.py
|
||||
from kicad import KiCad
|
||||
from kicad_api.base import KiCADBackend
|
||||
|
||||
class IPCBackend(KiCADBackend):
|
||||
"""KiCAD IPC API backend"""
|
||||
|
||||
def __init__(self):
|
||||
self.kicad = None
|
||||
|
||||
def connect(self) -> bool:
|
||||
"""Connect to running KiCAD instance"""
|
||||
try:
|
||||
self.kicad = KiCad()
|
||||
# Verify connection
|
||||
version = self.kicad.check_version()
|
||||
logger.info(f"Connected to KiCAD via IPC: {version}")
|
||||
return True
|
||||
except Exception as e:
|
||||
logger.error(f"Failed to connect via IPC: {e}")
|
||||
return False
|
||||
|
||||
def create_project(self, path: Path, name: str) -> dict:
|
||||
"""Create project using IPC API"""
|
||||
# Implementation here
|
||||
pass
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Backend Factory:**
|
||||
|
||||
```python
|
||||
# python/kicad_api/factory.py
|
||||
from typing import Optional
|
||||
from kicad_api.base import KiCADBackend
|
||||
from kicad_api.ipc_backend import IPCBackend
|
||||
from kicad_api.swig_backend import SWIGBackend
|
||||
|
||||
def create_backend(backend_type: Optional[str] = None) -> KiCADBackend:
|
||||
"""
|
||||
Create appropriate KiCAD backend
|
||||
|
||||
Args:
|
||||
backend_type: 'ipc', 'swig', or None for auto-detect
|
||||
|
||||
Returns:
|
||||
KiCADBackend instance
|
||||
"""
|
||||
if backend_type == 'ipc':
|
||||
return IPCBackend()
|
||||
elif backend_type == 'swig':
|
||||
return SWIGBackend()
|
||||
else:
|
||||
# Auto-detect: Try IPC first, fall back to SWIG
|
||||
try:
|
||||
backend = IPCBackend()
|
||||
if backend.connect():
|
||||
return backend
|
||||
except ImportError:
|
||||
pass
|
||||
|
||||
# Fall back to SWIG
|
||||
return SWIGBackend()
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Deliverables:**
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] Abstract base class defined
|
||||
- [ ] IPC backend implemented
|
||||
- [ ] SWIG backend (wrapper around existing code)
|
||||
- [ ] Factory with auto-detection
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 3: Port Core Modules (Days 5-8)
|
||||
|
||||
**Migration Order** (by complexity):
|
||||
|
||||
1. **project.py** (Simple - good starting point)
|
||||
- Create, open, save projects
|
||||
- Estimated: 2 hours
|
||||
|
||||
2. **board.py** (Medium - board properties)
|
||||
- Set size, layers, outline
|
||||
- Estimated: 4 hours
|
||||
|
||||
3. **component.py** (Complex - many operations)
|
||||
- Place, move, rotate, delete
|
||||
- Component arrays and alignment
|
||||
- Estimated: 8 hours
|
||||
|
||||
4. **routing.py** (Complex - trace routing)
|
||||
- Nets, traces, vias
|
||||
- Copper pours, differential pairs
|
||||
- Estimated: 8 hours
|
||||
|
||||
5. **design_rules.py** (Medium - DRC)
|
||||
- Set rules, run DRC
|
||||
- Estimated: 4 hours
|
||||
|
||||
6. **export.py** (Medium - file exports)
|
||||
- Gerber, PDF, SVG, 3D
|
||||
- Estimated: 4 hours
|
||||
|
||||
**Total Estimated Time: 30 hours (~4 days)**
|
||||
|
||||
**Migration Template:**
|
||||
|
||||
```python
|
||||
# OLD (SWIG)
|
||||
import pcbnew
|
||||
board = pcbnew.LoadBoard(filename)
|
||||
board.SetBoardSize(width, height)
|
||||
|
||||
# NEW (IPC via abstraction)
|
||||
from kicad_api import create_backend
|
||||
backend = create_backend('ipc')
|
||||
backend.connect()
|
||||
board_api = backend.get_board()
|
||||
board_api.set_size(width, height)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Deliverables:**
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] project.py migrated
|
||||
- [ ] board.py migrated
|
||||
- [ ] component.py migrated
|
||||
- [ ] routing.py migrated
|
||||
- [ ] design_rules.py migrated
|
||||
- [ ] export.py migrated
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 4: Testing & Validation (Days 9-10)
|
||||
|
||||
**Testing Strategy:**
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Unit Tests**
|
||||
|
||||
```python
|
||||
@pytest.mark.parametrize("backend_type", ["ipc", "swig"])
|
||||
def test_create_project(backend_type):
|
||||
backend = create_backend(backend_type)
|
||||
result = backend.create_project(Path("/tmp/test"), "TestProject")
|
||||
assert result["success"] is True
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Integration Tests**
|
||||
- Run side-by-side: IPC vs SWIG
|
||||
- Compare outputs for identical operations
|
||||
- Verify file compatibility
|
||||
|
||||
3. **Performance Benchmarks**
|
||||
```python
|
||||
# Measure: operations/second for each backend
|
||||
# Expected: IPC slightly slower due to IPC overhead
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Deliverables:**
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] 50+ unit tests passing for IPC backend
|
||||
- [ ] Side-by-side comparison tests
|
||||
- [ ] Performance benchmarks documented
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## API Comparison Reference
|
||||
|
||||
### Project Operations
|
||||
|
||||
| Operation | SWIG | IPC |
|
||||
| -------------- | -------------------- | ------------------------ |
|
||||
| Create project | Custom file creation | `kicad.create_project()` |
|
||||
| Open project | `pcbnew.LoadBoard()` | `kicad.open_project()` |
|
||||
| Save project | `board.Save()` | `board.save()` |
|
||||
|
||||
### Board Operations
|
||||
|
||||
| Operation | SWIG | IPC |
|
||||
| --------- | ----------------------- | -------------------- |
|
||||
| Get board | `pcbnew.LoadBoard()` | `kicad.get_board()` |
|
||||
| Set size | `board.SetBoardSize()` | `board.set_size()` |
|
||||
| Add layer | `board.GetLayerCount()` | `board.layers.add()` |
|
||||
|
||||
### Component Operations
|
||||
|
||||
| Operation | SWIG | IPC |
|
||||
| ---------------- | --------------------- | -------------------------- |
|
||||
| Place component | `pcbnew.FOOTPRINT()` | `board.add_footprint()` |
|
||||
| Move component | `fp.SetPosition()` | `footprint.set_position()` |
|
||||
| Rotate component | `fp.SetOrientation()` | `footprint.set_rotation()` |
|
||||
|
||||
### Routing Operations
|
||||
|
||||
| Operation | SWIG | IPC |
|
||||
| ----------- | --------------------- | ------------------- |
|
||||
| Add net | `board.GetNetCount()` | `board.nets.add()` |
|
||||
| Route trace | `pcbnew.PCB_TRACK()` | `board.add_track()` |
|
||||
| Add via | `pcbnew.PCB_VIA()` | `board.add_via()` |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Configuration Changes
|
||||
|
||||
### Update requirements.txt
|
||||
|
||||
```diff
|
||||
+ # KiCAD IPC API (official Python bindings)
|
||||
+ kicad-python>=0.5.0
|
||||
|
||||
# Legacy SWIG support (for backward compatibility)
|
||||
kicad-skip>=0.1.0
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Environment Variables
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Enable IPC API in KiCAD preferences
|
||||
# Preferences > Plugins > Enable IPC API Server
|
||||
|
||||
# Set backend preference (optional)
|
||||
export KICAD_BACKEND=ipc # or 'swig' or 'auto'
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### User Migration Guide
|
||||
|
||||
Create `docs/MIGRATING_TO_IPC.md`:
|
||||
|
||||
- How to enable IPC in KiCAD
|
||||
- What changes for users
|
||||
- Troubleshooting IPC connection issues
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Rollback Plan
|
||||
|
||||
If IPC migration fails:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Keep SWIG backend** - Already abstracted
|
||||
2. **Default to SWIG** - Change factory auto-detection
|
||||
3. **Document limitations** - Note that SWIG will be removed eventually
|
||||
4. **Plan retry** - Schedule IPC migration for later
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Success Criteria
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] ✅ All existing functionality works with IPC backend
|
||||
- [ ] ✅ Tests pass with both IPC and SWIG backends
|
||||
- [ ] ✅ Performance acceptable (< 20% slowdown vs SWIG)
|
||||
- [ ] ✅ Documentation updated
|
||||
- [ ] ✅ Migration guide created
|
||||
- [ ] ✅ User-facing tools work without changes
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Timeline
|
||||
|
||||
| Week | Days | Tasks |
|
||||
| ---------- | ------- | ----------------------------------------------- |
|
||||
| **Week 2** | Mon-Tue | Research, install kicad-python, test connection |
|
||||
| | Wed-Thu | Build abstraction layer |
|
||||
| | Fri | Port project.py and board.py |
|
||||
| **Week 3** | Mon-Tue | Port component.py and routing.py |
|
||||
| | Wed | Port design_rules.py and export.py |
|
||||
| | Thu-Fri | Testing, validation, documentation |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Resources
|
||||
|
||||
- **Official Docs:** https://docs.kicad.org/kicad-python-main
|
||||
- **kicad-python PyPI:** https://pypi.org/project/kicad-python/
|
||||
- **IPC API Spec:** https://dev-docs.kicad.org/en/apis-and-binding/ipc-api/
|
||||
- **Protocol Buffers:** Used by IPC for message format
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Open Questions
|
||||
|
||||
1. **How to handle KiCAD not running?**
|
||||
- Option A: Auto-launch KiCAD in background
|
||||
- Option B: Require user to launch KiCAD first
|
||||
- Option C: Fall back to SWIG if IPC unavailable
|
||||
- **Decision: Option C for now, A later**
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Connection management**
|
||||
- Should we keep connection open or connect per-operation?
|
||||
- **Decision: Keep alive with reconnect logic**
|
||||
|
||||
3. **Performance vs reliability**
|
||||
- IPC has overhead but more stable
|
||||
- **Decision: Reliability > performance**
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Next Steps (This Week)
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Install kicad-python**
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
pip install kicad-python
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Test IPC connection**
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
# Launch KiCAD
|
||||
# Enable IPC in preferences
|
||||
python3 -c "from kicad import KiCad; k=KiCad(); print(k.check_version())"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
3. **Create abstraction layer structure**
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
mkdir -p python/kicad_api
|
||||
touch python/kicad_api/{__init__,base,ipc_backend,swig_backend,factory}.py
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
4. **Begin project.py migration**
|
||||
- Start with simplest module
|
||||
- Establish patterns for others
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
**Prepared by:** Claude Code
|
||||
**Last Updated:** October 25, 2025
|
||||
**Status:** 📋 Ready to execute
|
||||
|
||||
File diff suppressed because it is too large
Load Diff
@@ -1,222 +1,241 @@
|
||||
# Router Implementation Status
|
||||
|
||||
## ✅ Phase 1 Complete: Foundation & Infrastructure
|
||||
|
||||
**Date:** December 28, 2025
|
||||
|
||||
### What Was Implemented
|
||||
|
||||
#### 1. Tool Registry (`src/tools/registry.ts`)
|
||||
- ✅ Complete tool categorization (59 tools → 7 categories)
|
||||
- ✅ Direct tools list (12 high-frequency tools)
|
||||
- ✅ Category lookup maps for O(1) access
|
||||
- ✅ Tool search functionality
|
||||
- ✅ Registry statistics and metadata
|
||||
|
||||
#### 2. Router Tools (`src/tools/router.ts`)
|
||||
- ✅ `list_tool_categories` - Browse all categories
|
||||
- ✅ `get_category_tools` - View tools in a category
|
||||
- ✅ `execute_tool` - Execute any routed tool
|
||||
- ✅ `search_tools` - Search tools by keyword
|
||||
|
||||
#### 3. Server Integration (`src/server.ts`)
|
||||
- ✅ Router tools registered at server startup
|
||||
- ✅ All tools remain functional (backwards compatible)
|
||||
- ✅ Logging added for router pattern status
|
||||
|
||||
#### 4. Documentation
|
||||
- ✅ `TOOL_INVENTORY.md` - Complete tool catalog
|
||||
- ✅ `ROUTER_ARCHITECTURE.md` - Design specification
|
||||
- ✅ `ROUTER_IMPLEMENTATION_STATUS.md` - This file
|
||||
|
||||
### Current State
|
||||
|
||||
**Status:** ✅ **Router Infrastructure Complete**
|
||||
|
||||
**Build:** ✅ Compiles successfully (`npm run build`)
|
||||
|
||||
**Tool Count:**
|
||||
- Total Tools: 59 (ALL still registered and visible)
|
||||
- Direct Tools: 12
|
||||
- Routed Tools: 47
|
||||
- Router Tools: 4
|
||||
- **Currently Visible to Claude:** 63 tools (59 + 4 router)
|
||||
|
||||
**Token Impact:**
|
||||
- **Current:** ~42K tokens (still showing all tools)
|
||||
- **Target:** ~12K tokens (Phase 2 optimization)
|
||||
- **Potential Savings:** ~30K tokens (71% reduction)
|
||||
|
||||
## 🔄 Phase 2: Token Optimization (Next Step)
|
||||
|
||||
### Objective
|
||||
Hide routed tools from Claude's context while keeping them accessible via `execute_tool`.
|
||||
|
||||
### Two Approaches
|
||||
|
||||
#### Option A: Registration Filtering (Recommended)
|
||||
Modify tool registration to conditionally register tools based on whether they're in the direct list.
|
||||
|
||||
**Changes needed:**
|
||||
1. Update each `register*Tools` function to check `isDirectTool()`
|
||||
2. Only call `server.tool()` for direct tools
|
||||
3. Routed tools remain accessible via `execute_tool` calling `callKicadScript`
|
||||
|
||||
**Pros:**
|
||||
- Clean separation
|
||||
- True token savings
|
||||
- No behavior changes
|
||||
|
||||
**Cons:**
|
||||
- Requires modifying 9 tool files
|
||||
|
||||
#### Option B: MCP Filter (If Supported)
|
||||
If MCP SDK supports tool filtering/hiding, use that instead.
|
||||
|
||||
**Pros:**
|
||||
- No tool file changes
|
||||
- Centralized control
|
||||
|
||||
**Cons:**
|
||||
- May not be supported by SDK
|
||||
- Needs investigation
|
||||
|
||||
### Implementation Plan for Phase 2
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Create Helper Function** (`src/tools/conditional-register.ts`)
|
||||
```typescript
|
||||
export function registerToolConditionally(
|
||||
server: McpServer,
|
||||
toolName: string,
|
||||
definition: ToolDefinition,
|
||||
handler: Function
|
||||
) {
|
||||
if (isDirectTool(toolName)) {
|
||||
// Register with MCP (visible to Claude)
|
||||
server.tool(toolName, definition, handler);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
// Register handler for execute_tool (hidden from Claude)
|
||||
registerToolHandler(toolName, handler);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Update Tool Registration Functions**
|
||||
Modify each `register*Tools` function to use conditional registration.
|
||||
|
||||
3. **Test**
|
||||
- Verify direct tools work normally
|
||||
- Verify routed tools work via `execute_tool`
|
||||
- Verify token count reduction
|
||||
|
||||
4. **Measure Impact**
|
||||
Count tools visible to Claude before/after.
|
||||
|
||||
## 📊 Categories & Distribution
|
||||
|
||||
| Category | Tools | Description |
|
||||
|----------|-------|-------------|
|
||||
| **board** | 9 | Board configuration, layers, zones, visualization |
|
||||
| **component** | 8 | Advanced component operations |
|
||||
| **export** | 8 | Manufacturing file generation |
|
||||
| **drc** | 9 | Design rule checking & validation |
|
||||
| **schematic** | 9 | Schematic editor operations |
|
||||
| **library** | 4 | Footprint library access |
|
||||
| **routing** | 3 | Advanced routing (vias, copper pours) |
|
||||
| **TOTAL** | **47** | **Routed tools** |
|
||||
| **direct** | **12** | **Always visible tools** |
|
||||
| **router** | **4** | **Discovery tools** |
|
||||
|
||||
## 🧪 Testing the Router
|
||||
|
||||
### Test 1: List Categories
|
||||
```
|
||||
User: "What tool categories are available?"
|
||||
|
||||
Expected: Claude calls list_tool_categories
|
||||
Result: Returns 7 categories with descriptions
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Test 2: Browse Category
|
||||
```
|
||||
User: "What export tools are available?"
|
||||
|
||||
Expected: Claude calls get_category_tools({ category: "export" })
|
||||
Result: Returns 8 export tools
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Test 3: Search Tools
|
||||
```
|
||||
User: "How do I export gerber files?"
|
||||
|
||||
Expected: Claude calls search_tools({ query: "gerber" })
|
||||
Result: Finds export_gerber in export category
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Test 4: Execute Tool
|
||||
```
|
||||
User: "Export gerbers to ./output"
|
||||
|
||||
Expected: Claude calls execute_tool({
|
||||
tool_name: "export_gerber",
|
||||
params: { outputDir: "./output" }
|
||||
})
|
||||
Result: Executes via router, returns gerber export result
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## 📝 Benefits Achieved (Phase 1)
|
||||
|
||||
1. ✅ **Foundation Ready**: All infrastructure in place
|
||||
2. ✅ **Organized**: 59 tools categorized into logical groups
|
||||
3. ✅ **Discoverable**: Tools easily found via search/browse
|
||||
4. ✅ **Backwards Compatible**: All existing tools still work
|
||||
5. ✅ **Extensible**: Easy to add new tools and categories
|
||||
6. ✅ **Documented**: Complete architecture and usage docs
|
||||
|
||||
## 🚀 Next Actions
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Optional: Complete Phase 2** (Token Optimization)
|
||||
- Implement conditional registration
|
||||
- Hide routed tools from context
|
||||
- Achieve 71% token reduction
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Or: Ship Phase 1 As-Is**
|
||||
- Router tools work perfectly now
|
||||
- Users can discover and execute tools
|
||||
- Optimization can be done later
|
||||
- No breaking changes
|
||||
|
||||
## 📚 Related Files
|
||||
|
||||
- `src/tools/registry.ts` - Tool registry and categories
|
||||
- `src/tools/router.ts` - Router tool implementations
|
||||
- `src/server.ts` - Server integration
|
||||
- `docs/TOOL_INVENTORY.md` - Complete tool list
|
||||
- `docs/ROUTER_ARCHITECTURE.md` - Design specification
|
||||
- `docs/mcp-router-guide.md` - Original implementation guide
|
||||
|
||||
## 💡 Usage Example
|
||||
|
||||
```typescript
|
||||
// User: "I need to export gerber files"
|
||||
|
||||
// Claude's interaction:
|
||||
// 1. Sees "export" and "gerber" keywords
|
||||
// 2. Calls search_tools({ query: "gerber" })
|
||||
// → Returns: { category: "export", tool: "export_gerber", ... }
|
||||
// 3. Calls execute_tool({
|
||||
// tool_name: "export_gerber",
|
||||
// params: { outputDir: "./gerbers" }
|
||||
// })
|
||||
// → Executes and returns result
|
||||
// 4. "I've exported your Gerber files to ./gerbers/"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Status Summary
|
||||
|
||||
✅ **Router Pattern: IMPLEMENTED**
|
||||
✅ **Build: PASSING**
|
||||
✅ **Backwards Compatible: YES**
|
||||
⏳ **Token Optimization: PENDING (Phase 2)**
|
||||
|
||||
The router infrastructure is complete and functional. The system now supports tool discovery and organized access to all 59 tools. Phase 2 optimization (hiding routed tools) can be implemented when ready for maximum token savings.
|
||||
# Router Implementation Status
|
||||
|
||||
## ✅ Phase 1 Complete: Foundation & Infrastructure
|
||||
|
||||
**Date:** December 28, 2025
|
||||
|
||||
### What Was Implemented
|
||||
|
||||
#### 1. Tool Registry (`src/tools/registry.ts`)
|
||||
|
||||
- ✅ Complete tool categorization (59 tools → 7 categories)
|
||||
- ✅ Direct tools list (12 high-frequency tools)
|
||||
- ✅ Category lookup maps for O(1) access
|
||||
- ✅ Tool search functionality
|
||||
- ✅ Registry statistics and metadata
|
||||
|
||||
#### 2. Router Tools (`src/tools/router.ts`)
|
||||
|
||||
- ✅ `list_tool_categories` - Browse all categories
|
||||
- ✅ `get_category_tools` - View tools in a category
|
||||
- ✅ `execute_tool` - Execute any routed tool
|
||||
- ✅ `search_tools` - Search tools by keyword
|
||||
|
||||
#### 3. Server Integration (`src/server.ts`)
|
||||
|
||||
- ✅ Router tools registered at server startup
|
||||
- ✅ All tools remain functional (backwards compatible)
|
||||
- ✅ Logging added for router pattern status
|
||||
|
||||
#### 4. Documentation
|
||||
|
||||
- ✅ `TOOL_INVENTORY.md` - Complete tool catalog
|
||||
- ✅ `ROUTER_ARCHITECTURE.md` - Design specification
|
||||
- ✅ `ROUTER_IMPLEMENTATION_STATUS.md` - This file
|
||||
|
||||
### Current State
|
||||
|
||||
**Status:** ✅ **Router Infrastructure Complete**
|
||||
|
||||
**Build:** ✅ Compiles successfully (`npm run build`)
|
||||
|
||||
**Tool Count:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Total Tools: 59 (ALL still registered and visible)
|
||||
- Direct Tools: 12
|
||||
- Routed Tools: 47
|
||||
- Router Tools: 4
|
||||
- **Currently Visible to Claude:** 63 tools (59 + 4 router)
|
||||
|
||||
**Token Impact:**
|
||||
|
||||
- **Current:** ~42K tokens (still showing all tools)
|
||||
- **Target:** ~12K tokens (Phase 2 optimization)
|
||||
- **Potential Savings:** ~30K tokens (71% reduction)
|
||||
|
||||
## 🔄 Phase 2: Token Optimization (Next Step)
|
||||
|
||||
### Objective
|
||||
|
||||
Hide routed tools from Claude's context while keeping them accessible via `execute_tool`.
|
||||
|
||||
### Two Approaches
|
||||
|
||||
#### Option A: Registration Filtering (Recommended)
|
||||
|
||||
Modify tool registration to conditionally register tools based on whether they're in the direct list.
|
||||
|
||||
**Changes needed:**
|
||||
|
||||
1. Update each `register*Tools` function to check `isDirectTool()`
|
||||
2. Only call `server.tool()` for direct tools
|
||||
3. Routed tools remain accessible via `execute_tool` calling `callKicadScript`
|
||||
|
||||
**Pros:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Clean separation
|
||||
- True token savings
|
||||
- No behavior changes
|
||||
|
||||
**Cons:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Requires modifying 9 tool files
|
||||
|
||||
#### Option B: MCP Filter (If Supported)
|
||||
|
||||
If MCP SDK supports tool filtering/hiding, use that instead.
|
||||
|
||||
**Pros:**
|
||||
|
||||
- No tool file changes
|
||||
- Centralized control
|
||||
|
||||
**Cons:**
|
||||
|
||||
- May not be supported by SDK
|
||||
- Needs investigation
|
||||
|
||||
### Implementation Plan for Phase 2
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Create Helper Function** (`src/tools/conditional-register.ts`)
|
||||
|
||||
```typescript
|
||||
export function registerToolConditionally(
|
||||
server: McpServer,
|
||||
toolName: string,
|
||||
definition: ToolDefinition,
|
||||
handler: Function,
|
||||
) {
|
||||
if (isDirectTool(toolName)) {
|
||||
// Register with MCP (visible to Claude)
|
||||
server.tool(toolName, definition, handler);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
// Register handler for execute_tool (hidden from Claude)
|
||||
registerToolHandler(toolName, handler);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Update Tool Registration Functions**
|
||||
Modify each `register*Tools` function to use conditional registration.
|
||||
|
||||
3. **Test**
|
||||
- Verify direct tools work normally
|
||||
- Verify routed tools work via `execute_tool`
|
||||
- Verify token count reduction
|
||||
|
||||
4. **Measure Impact**
|
||||
Count tools visible to Claude before/after.
|
||||
|
||||
## 📊 Categories & Distribution
|
||||
|
||||
| Category | Tools | Description |
|
||||
| ------------- | ------ | ------------------------------------------------- |
|
||||
| **board** | 9 | Board configuration, layers, zones, visualization |
|
||||
| **component** | 8 | Advanced component operations |
|
||||
| **export** | 8 | Manufacturing file generation |
|
||||
| **drc** | 9 | Design rule checking & validation |
|
||||
| **schematic** | 9 | Schematic editor operations |
|
||||
| **library** | 4 | Footprint library access |
|
||||
| **routing** | 3 | Advanced routing (vias, copper pours) |
|
||||
| **TOTAL** | **47** | **Routed tools** |
|
||||
| **direct** | **12** | **Always visible tools** |
|
||||
| **router** | **4** | **Discovery tools** |
|
||||
|
||||
## 🧪 Testing the Router
|
||||
|
||||
### Test 1: List Categories
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
User: "What tool categories are available?"
|
||||
|
||||
Expected: Claude calls list_tool_categories
|
||||
Result: Returns 7 categories with descriptions
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Test 2: Browse Category
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
User: "What export tools are available?"
|
||||
|
||||
Expected: Claude calls get_category_tools({ category: "export" })
|
||||
Result: Returns 8 export tools
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Test 3: Search Tools
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
User: "How do I export gerber files?"
|
||||
|
||||
Expected: Claude calls search_tools({ query: "gerber" })
|
||||
Result: Finds export_gerber in export category
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
### Test 4: Execute Tool
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
User: "Export gerbers to ./output"
|
||||
|
||||
Expected: Claude calls execute_tool({
|
||||
tool_name: "export_gerber",
|
||||
params: { outputDir: "./output" }
|
||||
})
|
||||
Result: Executes via router, returns gerber export result
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## 📝 Benefits Achieved (Phase 1)
|
||||
|
||||
1. ✅ **Foundation Ready**: All infrastructure in place
|
||||
2. ✅ **Organized**: 59 tools categorized into logical groups
|
||||
3. ✅ **Discoverable**: Tools easily found via search/browse
|
||||
4. ✅ **Backwards Compatible**: All existing tools still work
|
||||
5. ✅ **Extensible**: Easy to add new tools and categories
|
||||
6. ✅ **Documented**: Complete architecture and usage docs
|
||||
|
||||
## 🚀 Next Actions
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Optional: Complete Phase 2** (Token Optimization)
|
||||
- Implement conditional registration
|
||||
- Hide routed tools from context
|
||||
- Achieve 71% token reduction
|
||||
|
||||
2. **Or: Ship Phase 1 As-Is**
|
||||
- Router tools work perfectly now
|
||||
- Users can discover and execute tools
|
||||
- Optimization can be done later
|
||||
- No breaking changes
|
||||
|
||||
## 📚 Related Files
|
||||
|
||||
- `src/tools/registry.ts` - Tool registry and categories
|
||||
- `src/tools/router.ts` - Router tool implementations
|
||||
- `src/server.ts` - Server integration
|
||||
- `docs/TOOL_INVENTORY.md` - Complete tool list
|
||||
- `docs/ROUTER_ARCHITECTURE.md` - Design specification
|
||||
- `docs/mcp-router-guide.md` - Original implementation guide
|
||||
|
||||
## 💡 Usage Example
|
||||
|
||||
```typescript
|
||||
// User: "I need to export gerber files"
|
||||
|
||||
// Claude's interaction:
|
||||
// 1. Sees "export" and "gerber" keywords
|
||||
// 2. Calls search_tools({ query: "gerber" })
|
||||
// → Returns: { category: "export", tool: "export_gerber", ... }
|
||||
// 3. Calls execute_tool({
|
||||
// tool_name: "export_gerber",
|
||||
// params: { outputDir: "./gerbers" }
|
||||
// })
|
||||
// → Executes and returns result
|
||||
// 4. "I've exported your Gerber files to ./gerbers/"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Status Summary
|
||||
|
||||
✅ **Router Pattern: IMPLEMENTED**
|
||||
✅ **Build: PASSING**
|
||||
✅ **Backwards Compatible: YES**
|
||||
⏳ **Token Optimization: PENDING (Phase 2)**
|
||||
|
||||
The router infrastructure is complete and functional. The system now supports tool discovery and organized access to all 59 tools. Phase 2 optimization (hiding routed tools) can be implemented when ready for maximum token savings.
|
||||
|
||||
File diff suppressed because it is too large
Load Diff
@@ -1,125 +1,133 @@
|
||||
# Schematic Workflow Fix - Issue #26
|
||||
|
||||
## Problem Summary
|
||||
|
||||
The schematic workflow was completely broken due to incorrect usage of the kicad-skip library:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **`create_project`** only created PCB files, no schematic
|
||||
2. **`create_schematic`** created orphaned schematic files not linked to projects
|
||||
3. **`add_schematic_component`** called non-existent `schematic.add_symbol()` method
|
||||
4. Project files didn't reference schematics in their structure
|
||||
|
||||
## Root Cause
|
||||
|
||||
The kicad-skip library **does not support creating symbols from scratch**. The only way to add symbols is by **cloning existing symbol instances**.
|
||||
|
||||
From kicad-skip documentation:
|
||||
> "symbols: these don't have a new()" because they require complex mappings to library elements, pins, and properties.
|
||||
|
||||
## Solution
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Template-Based Approach
|
||||
|
||||
Created a template schematic (`python/templates/template_with_symbols.kicad_sch`) with:
|
||||
- Complete `lib_symbols` section defining R, C, LED symbols
|
||||
- Three template symbol instances placed off-screen at (-100, -110, -120)
|
||||
- Template symbols marked as `dnp yes`, `in_bom no`, `on_board no` so they don't interfere
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Updated Files
|
||||
|
||||
**python/commands/project.py:**
|
||||
- Now creates both `.kicad_pcb` AND `.kicad_sch` files
|
||||
- Project file includes schematic reference in `sheets` array
|
||||
- Copies template schematic with cloneable symbols
|
||||
|
||||
**python/commands/schematic.py:**
|
||||
- Uses template file instead of creating from scratch
|
||||
- Proper minimal schematic structure when template unavailable
|
||||
|
||||
**python/commands/component_schematic.py:**
|
||||
- Completely rewritten to use `clone()` API
|
||||
- Maps component types to template symbols
|
||||
- Proper UUID generation for each cloned symbol
|
||||
- Correct position setting: `symbol.at.value = [x, y, rotation]`
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Correct Workflow
|
||||
|
||||
```python
|
||||
from commands.project import ProjectCommands
|
||||
from commands.schematic import SchematicManager
|
||||
from commands.component_schematic import ComponentManager
|
||||
|
||||
# Step 1: Create project (creates both PCB and schematic)
|
||||
project_cmd = ProjectCommands()
|
||||
result = project_cmd.create_project({
|
||||
"name": "MyProject",
|
||||
"path": "/path/to/project"
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
# Step 2: Load the schematic
|
||||
sch = SchematicManager.load_schematic(result['project']['schematicPath'])
|
||||
|
||||
# Step 3: Add components by cloning templates
|
||||
component_def = {
|
||||
"type": "R", # Maps to _TEMPLATE_R
|
||||
"reference": "R1", # Component reference
|
||||
"value": "10k", # Component value
|
||||
"footprint": "Resistor_SMD:R_0603_1608Metric",
|
||||
"x": 50.8, # Position in mm
|
||||
"y": 50.8, # Position in mm
|
||||
"rotation": 0 # Rotation in degrees
|
||||
}
|
||||
symbol = ComponentManager.add_component(sch, component_def)
|
||||
|
||||
# Step 4: Save the schematic
|
||||
SchematicManager.save_schematic(sch, result['project']['schematicPath'])
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Supported Component Types
|
||||
|
||||
Currently supported template symbols:
|
||||
- `R` - Resistor (maps to `_TEMPLATE_R`)
|
||||
- `C` - Capacitor (maps to `_TEMPLATE_C`)
|
||||
- `D` or `LED` - LED (maps to `_TEMPLATE_D`)
|
||||
|
||||
To add more component types, update:
|
||||
1. `python/templates/template_with_symbols.kicad_sch` - Add lib_symbol definition and template instance
|
||||
2. `python/commands/component_schematic.py` - Add mapping in `TEMPLATE_MAP`
|
||||
|
||||
## Testing
|
||||
|
||||
Comprehensive test created at `/tmp/test_schematic_workflow.py`:
|
||||
- Creates project with schematic
|
||||
- Loads schematic
|
||||
- Adds R, C, LED components
|
||||
- Saves schematic
|
||||
- Validates with `kicad-cli sch export pdf`
|
||||
|
||||
All tests passing ✓
|
||||
|
||||
## Files Modified
|
||||
|
||||
- `python/commands/project.py` - Added schematic creation
|
||||
- `python/commands/schematic.py` - Fixed template usage
|
||||
- `python/commands/component_schematic.py` - Rewritten to use clone() API
|
||||
- `python/templates/empty.kicad_sch` - Minimal template (created)
|
||||
- `python/templates/template_with_symbols.kicad_sch` - Template with cloneable symbols (created)
|
||||
|
||||
## Limitations
|
||||
|
||||
1. Can only add components that have templates defined
|
||||
2. Template symbols remain in schematic (but marked as DNP/not in BOM)
|
||||
3. Complex symbols (multi-unit, hierarchical) may need custom templates
|
||||
|
||||
## Future Improvements
|
||||
|
||||
1. Add more component templates (transistors, connectors, ICs)
|
||||
2. Dynamic template generation from KiCad symbol libraries
|
||||
3. Auto-hide template symbols in schematic
|
||||
4. Support for custom user templates
|
||||
|
||||
## References
|
||||
|
||||
- GitHub Issue: #26
|
||||
- kicad-skip documentation: https://github.com/psychogenic/kicad-skip
|
||||
- Test results: `/tmp/test_schematic_workflow/`
|
||||
# Schematic Workflow Fix - Issue #26
|
||||
|
||||
## Problem Summary
|
||||
|
||||
The schematic workflow was completely broken due to incorrect usage of the kicad-skip library:
|
||||
|
||||
1. **`create_project`** only created PCB files, no schematic
|
||||
2. **`create_schematic`** created orphaned schematic files not linked to projects
|
||||
3. **`add_schematic_component`** called non-existent `schematic.add_symbol()` method
|
||||
4. Project files didn't reference schematics in their structure
|
||||
|
||||
## Root Cause
|
||||
|
||||
The kicad-skip library **does not support creating symbols from scratch**. The only way to add symbols is by **cloning existing symbol instances**.
|
||||
|
||||
From kicad-skip documentation:
|
||||
|
||||
> "symbols: these don't have a new()" because they require complex mappings to library elements, pins, and properties.
|
||||
|
||||
## Solution
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. Template-Based Approach
|
||||
|
||||
Created a template schematic (`python/templates/template_with_symbols.kicad_sch`) with:
|
||||
|
||||
- Complete `lib_symbols` section defining R, C, LED symbols
|
||||
- Three template symbol instances placed off-screen at (-100, -110, -120)
|
||||
- Template symbols marked as `dnp yes`, `in_bom no`, `on_board no` so they don't interfere
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. Updated Files
|
||||
|
||||
**python/commands/project.py:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Now creates both `.kicad_pcb` AND `.kicad_sch` files
|
||||
- Project file includes schematic reference in `sheets` array
|
||||
- Copies template schematic with cloneable symbols
|
||||
|
||||
**python/commands/schematic.py:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Uses template file instead of creating from scratch
|
||||
- Proper minimal schematic structure when template unavailable
|
||||
|
||||
**python/commands/component_schematic.py:**
|
||||
|
||||
- Completely rewritten to use `clone()` API
|
||||
- Maps component types to template symbols
|
||||
- Proper UUID generation for each cloned symbol
|
||||
- Correct position setting: `symbol.at.value = [x, y, rotation]`
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. Correct Workflow
|
||||
|
||||
```python
|
||||
from commands.project import ProjectCommands
|
||||
from commands.schematic import SchematicManager
|
||||
from commands.component_schematic import ComponentManager
|
||||
|
||||
# Step 1: Create project (creates both PCB and schematic)
|
||||
project_cmd = ProjectCommands()
|
||||
result = project_cmd.create_project({
|
||||
"name": "MyProject",
|
||||
"path": "/path/to/project"
|
||||
})
|
||||
|
||||
# Step 2: Load the schematic
|
||||
sch = SchematicManager.load_schematic(result['project']['schematicPath'])
|
||||
|
||||
# Step 3: Add components by cloning templates
|
||||
component_def = {
|
||||
"type": "R", # Maps to _TEMPLATE_R
|
||||
"reference": "R1", # Component reference
|
||||
"value": "10k", # Component value
|
||||
"footprint": "Resistor_SMD:R_0603_1608Metric",
|
||||
"x": 50.8, # Position in mm
|
||||
"y": 50.8, # Position in mm
|
||||
"rotation": 0 # Rotation in degrees
|
||||
}
|
||||
symbol = ComponentManager.add_component(sch, component_def)
|
||||
|
||||
# Step 4: Save the schematic
|
||||
SchematicManager.save_schematic(sch, result['project']['schematicPath'])
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
## Supported Component Types
|
||||
|
||||
Currently supported template symbols:
|
||||
|
||||
- `R` - Resistor (maps to `_TEMPLATE_R`)
|
||||
- `C` - Capacitor (maps to `_TEMPLATE_C`)
|
||||
- `D` or `LED` - LED (maps to `_TEMPLATE_D`)
|
||||
|
||||
To add more component types, update:
|
||||
|
||||
1. `python/templates/template_with_symbols.kicad_sch` - Add lib_symbol definition and template instance
|
||||
2. `python/commands/component_schematic.py` - Add mapping in `TEMPLATE_MAP`
|
||||
|
||||
## Testing
|
||||
|
||||
Comprehensive test created at `/tmp/test_schematic_workflow.py`:
|
||||
|
||||
- Creates project with schematic
|
||||
- Loads schematic
|
||||
- Adds R, C, LED components
|
||||
- Saves schematic
|
||||
- Validates with `kicad-cli sch export pdf`
|
||||
|
||||
All tests passing ✓
|
||||
|
||||
## Files Modified
|
||||
|
||||
- `python/commands/project.py` - Added schematic creation
|
||||
- `python/commands/schematic.py` - Fixed template usage
|
||||
- `python/commands/component_schematic.py` - Rewritten to use clone() API
|
||||
- `python/templates/empty.kicad_sch` - Minimal template (created)
|
||||
- `python/templates/template_with_symbols.kicad_sch` - Template with cloneable symbols (created)
|
||||
|
||||
## Limitations
|
||||
|
||||
1. Can only add components that have templates defined
|
||||
2. Template symbols remain in schematic (but marked as DNP/not in BOM)
|
||||
3. Complex symbols (multi-unit, hierarchical) may need custom templates
|
||||
|
||||
## Future Improvements
|
||||
|
||||
1. Add more component templates (transistors, connectors, ICs)
|
||||
2. Dynamic template generation from KiCad symbol libraries
|
||||
3. Auto-hide template symbols in schematic
|
||||
4. Support for custom user templates
|
||||
|
||||
## References
|
||||
|
||||
- GitHub Issue: #26
|
||||
- kicad-skip documentation: https://github.com/psychogenic/kicad-skip
|
||||
- Test results: `/tmp/test_schematic_workflow/`
|
||||
|
||||
File diff suppressed because it is too large
Load Diff
@@ -1,422 +1,457 @@
|
||||
# Week 1 - Session 2 Summary
|
||||
**Date:** October 25, 2025 (Afternoon)
|
||||
**Status:** 🚀 **OUTSTANDING PROGRESS**
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 🎯 Session Goals
|
||||
|
||||
Continue Week 1 implementation while user installs KiCAD:
|
||||
1. Update README with comprehensive Linux guide
|
||||
2. Create installation scripts
|
||||
3. Begin IPC API preparation
|
||||
4. Set up development infrastructure
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## ✅ Completed Work
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. **README.md Major Update** 📚
|
||||
|
||||
**File:** `README.md`
|
||||
|
||||
**Changes:**
|
||||
- ✅ Updated project status to reflect v2.0 rebuild
|
||||
- ✅ Added collapsible platform-specific installation sections:
|
||||
- 🐧 **Linux (Ubuntu/Debian)** - Primary, detailed
|
||||
- 🪟 **Windows 10/11** - Fully supported
|
||||
- 🍎 **macOS** - Experimental
|
||||
- ✅ Updated system requirements (Linux primary platform)
|
||||
- ✅ Added Quick Start section with test commands
|
||||
- ✅ Better visual organization with emojis and status indicators
|
||||
|
||||
**Impact:** New users can now install on Linux in < 10 minutes!
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. **Linux Installation Script** 🛠️
|
||||
|
||||
**File:** `scripts/install-linux.sh`
|
||||
|
||||
**Features:**
|
||||
- ✅ Fully automated Ubuntu/Debian installation
|
||||
- ✅ Color-coded output (info/success/warning/error)
|
||||
- ✅ Safety checks (platform detection, command validation)
|
||||
- ✅ Installs:
|
||||
- KiCAD 9.0 from PPA
|
||||
- Node.js 20.x
|
||||
- Python dependencies
|
||||
- Builds TypeScript
|
||||
- ✅ Verification checks after installation
|
||||
- ✅ Helpful next-steps guidance
|
||||
|
||||
**Usage:**
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
cd kicad-mcp-server
|
||||
./scripts/install-linux.sh
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Lines of Code:** ~200 lines of robust shell script
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. **Pre-Commit Hooks Configuration** 🔧
|
||||
|
||||
**File:** `.pre-commit-config.yaml`
|
||||
|
||||
**Hooks Added:**
|
||||
- ✅ **Python:**
|
||||
- Black (code formatting)
|
||||
- isort (import sorting)
|
||||
- MyPy (type checking)
|
||||
- Flake8 (linting)
|
||||
- Bandit (security checks)
|
||||
- ✅ **TypeScript/JavaScript:**
|
||||
- Prettier (formatting)
|
||||
- ✅ **General:**
|
||||
- Trailing whitespace removal
|
||||
- End-of-file fixer
|
||||
- YAML/JSON validation
|
||||
- Large file detection
|
||||
- Merge conflict detection
|
||||
- Private key detection
|
||||
- ✅ **Markdown:**
|
||||
- Markdownlint (formatting)
|
||||
|
||||
**Setup:**
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
pip install pre-commit
|
||||
pre-commit install
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Impact:** Automatic code quality enforcement on every commit!
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. **IPC API Migration Plan** 📋
|
||||
|
||||
**File:** `docs/IPC_API_MIGRATION_PLAN.md`
|
||||
|
||||
**Comprehensive 30-page migration guide:**
|
||||
- ✅ Why migrate (SWIG deprecation analysis)
|
||||
- ✅ IPC API architecture overview
|
||||
- ✅ 4-phase migration strategy (10 days)
|
||||
- ✅ API comparison tables (SWIG vs IPC)
|
||||
- ✅ Testing strategy
|
||||
- ✅ Rollback plan
|
||||
- ✅ Success criteria
|
||||
- ✅ Timeline with day-by-day tasks
|
||||
|
||||
**Key Insights:**
|
||||
- SWIG will be removed in KiCAD 10.0
|
||||
- IPC is faster for some operations
|
||||
- Protocol Buffers ensure API stability
|
||||
- Multi-language support opens future possibilities
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. **IPC API Abstraction Layer** 🏗️
|
||||
|
||||
**New Module:** `python/kicad_api/`
|
||||
|
||||
**Files Created (5):**
|
||||
|
||||
1. **`__init__.py`** (20 lines)
|
||||
- Package exports
|
||||
- Version info
|
||||
- Usage examples
|
||||
|
||||
2. **`base.py`** (180 lines)
|
||||
- `KiCADBackend` abstract base class
|
||||
- `BoardAPI` abstract interface
|
||||
- Custom exceptions (`BackendError`, `ConnectionError`, etc.)
|
||||
- Defines contract for all backends
|
||||
|
||||
3. **`factory.py`** (160 lines)
|
||||
- `create_backend()` - Smart backend selection
|
||||
- Auto-detection (try IPC, fall back to SWIG)
|
||||
- Environment variable support (`KICAD_BACKEND`)
|
||||
- `get_available_backends()` - Diagnostic function
|
||||
- Comprehensive error handling
|
||||
|
||||
4. **`ipc_backend.py`** (210 lines)
|
||||
- `IPCBackend` class (kicad-python wrapper)
|
||||
- `IPCBoardAPI` class
|
||||
- Connection management
|
||||
- Skeleton methods (to be implemented in Week 2-3)
|
||||
- Clear TODO markers for migration
|
||||
|
||||
5. **`swig_backend.py`** (220 lines)
|
||||
- `SWIGBackend` class (wraps existing code)
|
||||
- `SWIGBoardAPI` class
|
||||
- Backward compatibility layer
|
||||
- Deprecation warnings
|
||||
- Bridges old commands to new interface
|
||||
|
||||
**Total Lines of Code:** ~800 lines
|
||||
|
||||
**Architecture:**
|
||||
```python
|
||||
from kicad_api import create_backend
|
||||
|
||||
# Auto-detect best backend
|
||||
backend = create_backend()
|
||||
|
||||
# Or specify explicitly
|
||||
backend = create_backend('ipc') # Use IPC
|
||||
backend = create_backend('swig') # Use SWIG (deprecated)
|
||||
|
||||
# Use unified interface
|
||||
if backend.connect():
|
||||
board = backend.get_board()
|
||||
board.set_size(100, 80)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Key Features:**
|
||||
- ✅ Abstraction allows painless migration
|
||||
- ✅ Both backends can coexist during transition
|
||||
- ✅ Easy testing (compare SWIG vs IPC outputs)
|
||||
- ✅ Future-proof (add new backends easily)
|
||||
- ✅ Type hints throughout
|
||||
- ✅ Comprehensive error handling
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### 6. **Enhanced package.json** 📦
|
||||
|
||||
**File:** `package.json`
|
||||
|
||||
**Improvements:**
|
||||
- ✅ Version bumped to `2.0.0-alpha.1`
|
||||
- ✅ Better description
|
||||
- ✅ Enhanced npm scripts:
|
||||
```json
|
||||
"build:watch": "tsc --watch"
|
||||
"clean": "rm -rf dist"
|
||||
"rebuild": "npm run clean && npm run build"
|
||||
"test": "npm run test:ts && npm run test:py"
|
||||
"test:py": "pytest tests/ -v"
|
||||
"test:coverage": "pytest with coverage"
|
||||
"lint": "npm run lint:ts && npm run lint:py"
|
||||
"lint:py": "black + mypy + flake8"
|
||||
"format": "prettier + black"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Impact:** Better developer experience, easier workflows
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 📊 Statistics
|
||||
|
||||
### Files Created/Modified (Session 2)
|
||||
|
||||
**New Files (10):**
|
||||
```
|
||||
docs/IPC_API_MIGRATION_PLAN.md # 500+ lines
|
||||
docs/WEEK1_SESSION2_SUMMARY.md # This file
|
||||
scripts/install-linux.sh # 200 lines
|
||||
.pre-commit-config.yaml # 60 lines
|
||||
python/kicad_api/__init__.py # 20 lines
|
||||
python/kicad_api/base.py # 180 lines
|
||||
python/kicad_api/factory.py # 160 lines
|
||||
python/kicad_api/ipc_backend.py # 210 lines
|
||||
python/kicad_api/swig_backend.py # 220 lines
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Modified Files (2):**
|
||||
```
|
||||
README.md # Major rewrite
|
||||
package.json # Enhanced scripts
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Total New Lines:** ~1,600+ lines of code/documentation
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### Combined Sessions 1+2 Today
|
||||
|
||||
**Files Created:** 27
|
||||
**Lines Written:** ~3,000+
|
||||
**Documentation Pages:** 8
|
||||
**Tests Created:** 20+
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 🎯 Week 1 Status
|
||||
|
||||
### Progress: **95% Complete** ████████████░
|
||||
|
||||
| Task | Status |
|
||||
|------|--------|
|
||||
| Linux compatibility | ✅ Complete |
|
||||
| CI/CD pipeline | ✅ Complete |
|
||||
| Cross-platform paths | ✅ Complete |
|
||||
| Developer docs | ✅ Complete |
|
||||
| pytest framework | ✅ Complete |
|
||||
| Config templates | ✅ Complete |
|
||||
| Installation scripts | ✅ Complete |
|
||||
| Pre-commit hooks | ✅ Complete |
|
||||
| IPC migration plan | ✅ Complete |
|
||||
| IPC abstraction layer | ✅ Complete |
|
||||
| README updates | ✅ Complete |
|
||||
| Testing on Ubuntu | ⏳ Pending (needs KiCAD install) |
|
||||
|
||||
**Only Remaining:** Test with actual KiCAD 9.0 installation!
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 🚀 Ready for Week 2
|
||||
|
||||
### IPC API Migration Prep ✅
|
||||
|
||||
Everything is in place to begin migration:
|
||||
- ✅ Abstraction layer architecture defined
|
||||
- ✅ Base classes and interfaces ready
|
||||
- ✅ Factory pattern for backend selection
|
||||
- ✅ SWIG wrapper for backward compatibility
|
||||
- ✅ IPC skeleton awaiting implementation
|
||||
- ✅ Comprehensive migration plan documented
|
||||
|
||||
**Week 2 kickoff tasks:**
|
||||
1. Install `kicad-python` package
|
||||
2. Test IPC connection to running KiCAD
|
||||
3. Begin porting `project.py` module
|
||||
4. Create side-by-side tests (SWIG vs IPC)
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 💡 Key Insights from Session 2
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. **Installation Automation**
|
||||
The bash script reduces setup time from 30+ minutes to < 10 minutes with zero manual intervention.
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. **Pre-Commit Hooks**
|
||||
Automatic code quality checks prevent bugs before they're committed. This will save hours in code review.
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. **Abstraction Pattern**
|
||||
The backend abstraction is elegant - allows gradual migration without breaking existing functionality. Users won't notice the transition.
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. **Documentation Quality**
|
||||
The IPC migration plan is thorough enough that another developer could execute it independently.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 🧪 Testing Readiness
|
||||
|
||||
### When KiCAD is Installed
|
||||
|
||||
You can immediately test:
|
||||
|
||||
**1. Platform Helper:**
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
python3 python/utils/platform_helper.py
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**2. Backend Detection:**
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
python3 python/kicad_api/factory.py
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**3. Installation Script:**
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
./scripts/install-linux.sh
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**4. Pytest Suite:**
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
pytest tests/ -v
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**5. Pre-commit Hooks:**
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
pre-commit run --all-files
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 📈 Impact Assessment
|
||||
|
||||
### Developer Onboarding
|
||||
- **Before:** 2-3 hours setup, Windows-only, manual steps
|
||||
- **After:** 10 minutes automated, cross-platform, one script
|
||||
|
||||
### Code Quality
|
||||
- **Before:** No automated checks, inconsistent style
|
||||
- **After:** Pre-commit hooks, 100% type hints, Black formatting
|
||||
|
||||
### Future-Proofing
|
||||
- **Before:** Deprecated SWIG API, no migration path
|
||||
- **After:** IPC API ready, abstraction layer in place
|
||||
|
||||
### Documentation
|
||||
- **Before:** README only, Windows-focused
|
||||
- **After:** 8 comprehensive docs, Linux-primary, migration guides
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 🎯 Next Actions
|
||||
|
||||
### Immediate (Tonight/Tomorrow)
|
||||
1. Install KiCAD 9.0 on your system
|
||||
2. Run `./scripts/install-linux.sh`
|
||||
3. Test backend detection
|
||||
4. Verify pytest suite passes
|
||||
|
||||
### Week 2 Start (Monday)
|
||||
1. Install `kicad-python` package
|
||||
2. Test IPC connection
|
||||
3. Begin project.py migration
|
||||
4. Create first IPC API tests
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 🏆 Session 2 Achievements
|
||||
|
||||
### Infrastructure
|
||||
- ✅ Automated Linux installation
|
||||
- ✅ Pre-commit hooks for code quality
|
||||
- ✅ Enhanced npm scripts
|
||||
- ✅ IPC API abstraction layer (800+ lines)
|
||||
|
||||
### Documentation
|
||||
- ✅ Updated README (Linux-primary)
|
||||
- ✅ 30-page IPC migration plan
|
||||
- ✅ Session summaries
|
||||
|
||||
### Architecture
|
||||
- ✅ Backend abstraction pattern
|
||||
- ✅ Factory with auto-detection
|
||||
- ✅ SWIG backward compatibility
|
||||
- ✅ IPC skeleton ready for implementation
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 🎉 Overall Day Summary
|
||||
|
||||
**Sessions 1+2 Combined:**
|
||||
- ⏱️ **Time:** ~4-5 hours total
|
||||
- 📝 **Files:** 27 created
|
||||
- 💻 **Code:** ~3,000+ lines
|
||||
- 📚 **Docs:** 8 comprehensive pages
|
||||
- 🧪 **Tests:** 20+ unit tests
|
||||
- ✅ **Week 1:** 95% complete
|
||||
|
||||
**Status:** 🟢 **AHEAD OF SCHEDULE**
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 🚀 Momentum Check
|
||||
|
||||
**Energy Level:** 🔋🔋🔋🔋🔋 (Maximum)
|
||||
**Code Quality:** ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ (Excellent)
|
||||
**Documentation:** 📖📖📖📖📖 (Comprehensive)
|
||||
**Architecture:** 🏗️🏗️🏗️🏗️🏗️ (Solid)
|
||||
|
||||
**Ready for Week 2 IPC Migration:** ✅ YES!
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
**End of Session 2**
|
||||
**Next:** KiCAD installation + testing + Week 2 kickoff
|
||||
|
||||
Let's keep this incredible momentum going! 🎉🚀
|
||||
# Week 1 - Session 2 Summary
|
||||
|
||||
**Date:** October 25, 2025 (Afternoon)
|
||||
**Status:** 🚀 **OUTSTANDING PROGRESS**
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 🎯 Session Goals
|
||||
|
||||
Continue Week 1 implementation while user installs KiCAD:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Update README with comprehensive Linux guide
|
||||
2. Create installation scripts
|
||||
3. Begin IPC API preparation
|
||||
4. Set up development infrastructure
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## ✅ Completed Work
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. **README.md Major Update** 📚
|
||||
|
||||
**File:** `README.md`
|
||||
|
||||
**Changes:**
|
||||
|
||||
- ✅ Updated project status to reflect v2.0 rebuild
|
||||
- ✅ Added collapsible platform-specific installation sections:
|
||||
- 🐧 **Linux (Ubuntu/Debian)** - Primary, detailed
|
||||
- 🪟 **Windows 10/11** - Fully supported
|
||||
- 🍎 **macOS** - Experimental
|
||||
- ✅ Updated system requirements (Linux primary platform)
|
||||
- ✅ Added Quick Start section with test commands
|
||||
- ✅ Better visual organization with emojis and status indicators
|
||||
|
||||
**Impact:** New users can now install on Linux in < 10 minutes!
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. **Linux Installation Script** 🛠️
|
||||
|
||||
**File:** `scripts/install-linux.sh`
|
||||
|
||||
**Features:**
|
||||
|
||||
- ✅ Fully automated Ubuntu/Debian installation
|
||||
- ✅ Color-coded output (info/success/warning/error)
|
||||
- ✅ Safety checks (platform detection, command validation)
|
||||
- ✅ Installs:
|
||||
- KiCAD 9.0 from PPA
|
||||
- Node.js 20.x
|
||||
- Python dependencies
|
||||
- Builds TypeScript
|
||||
- ✅ Verification checks after installation
|
||||
- ✅ Helpful next-steps guidance
|
||||
|
||||
**Usage:**
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
cd kicad-mcp-server
|
||||
./scripts/install-linux.sh
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Lines of Code:** ~200 lines of robust shell script
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. **Pre-Commit Hooks Configuration** 🔧
|
||||
|
||||
**File:** `.pre-commit-config.yaml`
|
||||
|
||||
**Hooks Added:**
|
||||
|
||||
- ✅ **Python:**
|
||||
- Black (code formatting)
|
||||
- isort (import sorting)
|
||||
- MyPy (type checking)
|
||||
- Flake8 (linting)
|
||||
- Bandit (security checks)
|
||||
- ✅ **TypeScript/JavaScript:**
|
||||
- Prettier (formatting)
|
||||
- ✅ **General:**
|
||||
- Trailing whitespace removal
|
||||
- End-of-file fixer
|
||||
- YAML/JSON validation
|
||||
- Large file detection
|
||||
- Merge conflict detection
|
||||
- Private key detection
|
||||
- ✅ **Markdown:**
|
||||
- Markdownlint (formatting)
|
||||
|
||||
**Setup:**
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
pip install pre-commit
|
||||
pre-commit install
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Impact:** Automatic code quality enforcement on every commit!
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. **IPC API Migration Plan** 📋
|
||||
|
||||
**File:** `docs/IPC_API_MIGRATION_PLAN.md`
|
||||
|
||||
**Comprehensive 30-page migration guide:**
|
||||
|
||||
- ✅ Why migrate (SWIG deprecation analysis)
|
||||
- ✅ IPC API architecture overview
|
||||
- ✅ 4-phase migration strategy (10 days)
|
||||
- ✅ API comparison tables (SWIG vs IPC)
|
||||
- ✅ Testing strategy
|
||||
- ✅ Rollback plan
|
||||
- ✅ Success criteria
|
||||
- ✅ Timeline with day-by-day tasks
|
||||
|
||||
**Key Insights:**
|
||||
|
||||
- SWIG will be removed in KiCAD 10.0
|
||||
- IPC is faster for some operations
|
||||
- Protocol Buffers ensure API stability
|
||||
- Multi-language support opens future possibilities
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. **IPC API Abstraction Layer** 🏗️
|
||||
|
||||
**New Module:** `python/kicad_api/`
|
||||
|
||||
**Files Created (5):**
|
||||
|
||||
1. **`__init__.py`** (20 lines)
|
||||
- Package exports
|
||||
- Version info
|
||||
- Usage examples
|
||||
|
||||
2. **`base.py`** (180 lines)
|
||||
- `KiCADBackend` abstract base class
|
||||
- `BoardAPI` abstract interface
|
||||
- Custom exceptions (`BackendError`, `ConnectionError`, etc.)
|
||||
- Defines contract for all backends
|
||||
|
||||
3. **`factory.py`** (160 lines)
|
||||
- `create_backend()` - Smart backend selection
|
||||
- Auto-detection (try IPC, fall back to SWIG)
|
||||
- Environment variable support (`KICAD_BACKEND`)
|
||||
- `get_available_backends()` - Diagnostic function
|
||||
- Comprehensive error handling
|
||||
|
||||
4. **`ipc_backend.py`** (210 lines)
|
||||
- `IPCBackend` class (kicad-python wrapper)
|
||||
- `IPCBoardAPI` class
|
||||
- Connection management
|
||||
- Skeleton methods (to be implemented in Week 2-3)
|
||||
- Clear TODO markers for migration
|
||||
|
||||
5. **`swig_backend.py`** (220 lines)
|
||||
- `SWIGBackend` class (wraps existing code)
|
||||
- `SWIGBoardAPI` class
|
||||
- Backward compatibility layer
|
||||
- Deprecation warnings
|
||||
- Bridges old commands to new interface
|
||||
|
||||
**Total Lines of Code:** ~800 lines
|
||||
|
||||
**Architecture:**
|
||||
|
||||
```python
|
||||
from kicad_api import create_backend
|
||||
|
||||
# Auto-detect best backend
|
||||
backend = create_backend()
|
||||
|
||||
# Or specify explicitly
|
||||
backend = create_backend('ipc') # Use IPC
|
||||
backend = create_backend('swig') # Use SWIG (deprecated)
|
||||
|
||||
# Use unified interface
|
||||
if backend.connect():
|
||||
board = backend.get_board()
|
||||
board.set_size(100, 80)
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Key Features:**
|
||||
|
||||
- ✅ Abstraction allows painless migration
|
||||
- ✅ Both backends can coexist during transition
|
||||
- ✅ Easy testing (compare SWIG vs IPC outputs)
|
||||
- ✅ Future-proof (add new backends easily)
|
||||
- ✅ Type hints throughout
|
||||
- ✅ Comprehensive error handling
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### 6. **Enhanced package.json** 📦
|
||||
|
||||
**File:** `package.json`
|
||||
|
||||
**Improvements:**
|
||||
|
||||
- ✅ Version bumped to `2.0.0-alpha.1`
|
||||
- ✅ Better description
|
||||
- ✅ Enhanced npm scripts:
|
||||
```json
|
||||
"build:watch": "tsc --watch"
|
||||
"clean": "rm -rf dist"
|
||||
"rebuild": "npm run clean && npm run build"
|
||||
"test": "npm run test:ts && npm run test:py"
|
||||
"test:py": "pytest tests/ -v"
|
||||
"test:coverage": "pytest with coverage"
|
||||
"lint": "npm run lint:ts && npm run lint:py"
|
||||
"lint:py": "black + mypy + flake8"
|
||||
"format": "prettier + black"
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Impact:** Better developer experience, easier workflows
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 📊 Statistics
|
||||
|
||||
### Files Created/Modified (Session 2)
|
||||
|
||||
**New Files (10):**
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
docs/IPC_API_MIGRATION_PLAN.md # 500+ lines
|
||||
docs/WEEK1_SESSION2_SUMMARY.md # This file
|
||||
scripts/install-linux.sh # 200 lines
|
||||
.pre-commit-config.yaml # 60 lines
|
||||
python/kicad_api/__init__.py # 20 lines
|
||||
python/kicad_api/base.py # 180 lines
|
||||
python/kicad_api/factory.py # 160 lines
|
||||
python/kicad_api/ipc_backend.py # 210 lines
|
||||
python/kicad_api/swig_backend.py # 220 lines
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Modified Files (2):**
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
README.md # Major rewrite
|
||||
package.json # Enhanced scripts
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Total New Lines:** ~1,600+ lines of code/documentation
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### Combined Sessions 1+2 Today
|
||||
|
||||
**Files Created:** 27
|
||||
**Lines Written:** ~3,000+
|
||||
**Documentation Pages:** 8
|
||||
**Tests Created:** 20+
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 🎯 Week 1 Status
|
||||
|
||||
### Progress: **95% Complete** ████████████░
|
||||
|
||||
| Task | Status |
|
||||
| --------------------- | -------------------------------- |
|
||||
| Linux compatibility | ✅ Complete |
|
||||
| CI/CD pipeline | ✅ Complete |
|
||||
| Cross-platform paths | ✅ Complete |
|
||||
| Developer docs | ✅ Complete |
|
||||
| pytest framework | ✅ Complete |
|
||||
| Config templates | ✅ Complete |
|
||||
| Installation scripts | ✅ Complete |
|
||||
| Pre-commit hooks | ✅ Complete |
|
||||
| IPC migration plan | ✅ Complete |
|
||||
| IPC abstraction layer | ✅ Complete |
|
||||
| README updates | ✅ Complete |
|
||||
| Testing on Ubuntu | ⏳ Pending (needs KiCAD install) |
|
||||
|
||||
**Only Remaining:** Test with actual KiCAD 9.0 installation!
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 🚀 Ready for Week 2
|
||||
|
||||
### IPC API Migration Prep ✅
|
||||
|
||||
Everything is in place to begin migration:
|
||||
|
||||
- ✅ Abstraction layer architecture defined
|
||||
- ✅ Base classes and interfaces ready
|
||||
- ✅ Factory pattern for backend selection
|
||||
- ✅ SWIG wrapper for backward compatibility
|
||||
- ✅ IPC skeleton awaiting implementation
|
||||
- ✅ Comprehensive migration plan documented
|
||||
|
||||
**Week 2 kickoff tasks:**
|
||||
|
||||
1. Install `kicad-python` package
|
||||
2. Test IPC connection to running KiCAD
|
||||
3. Begin porting `project.py` module
|
||||
4. Create side-by-side tests (SWIG vs IPC)
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 💡 Key Insights from Session 2
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. **Installation Automation**
|
||||
|
||||
The bash script reduces setup time from 30+ minutes to < 10 minutes with zero manual intervention.
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. **Pre-Commit Hooks**
|
||||
|
||||
Automatic code quality checks prevent bugs before they're committed. This will save hours in code review.
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. **Abstraction Pattern**
|
||||
|
||||
The backend abstraction is elegant - allows gradual migration without breaking existing functionality. Users won't notice the transition.
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. **Documentation Quality**
|
||||
|
||||
The IPC migration plan is thorough enough that another developer could execute it independently.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 🧪 Testing Readiness
|
||||
|
||||
### When KiCAD is Installed
|
||||
|
||||
You can immediately test:
|
||||
|
||||
**1. Platform Helper:**
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
python3 python/utils/platform_helper.py
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**2. Backend Detection:**
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
python3 python/kicad_api/factory.py
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**3. Installation Script:**
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
./scripts/install-linux.sh
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**4. Pytest Suite:**
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
pytest tests/ -v
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**5. Pre-commit Hooks:**
|
||||
|
||||
```bash
|
||||
pre-commit run --all-files
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 📈 Impact Assessment
|
||||
|
||||
### Developer Onboarding
|
||||
|
||||
- **Before:** 2-3 hours setup, Windows-only, manual steps
|
||||
- **After:** 10 minutes automated, cross-platform, one script
|
||||
|
||||
### Code Quality
|
||||
|
||||
- **Before:** No automated checks, inconsistent style
|
||||
- **After:** Pre-commit hooks, 100% type hints, Black formatting
|
||||
|
||||
### Future-Proofing
|
||||
|
||||
- **Before:** Deprecated SWIG API, no migration path
|
||||
- **After:** IPC API ready, abstraction layer in place
|
||||
|
||||
### Documentation
|
||||
|
||||
- **Before:** README only, Windows-focused
|
||||
- **After:** 8 comprehensive docs, Linux-primary, migration guides
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 🎯 Next Actions
|
||||
|
||||
### Immediate (Tonight/Tomorrow)
|
||||
|
||||
1. Install KiCAD 9.0 on your system
|
||||
2. Run `./scripts/install-linux.sh`
|
||||
3. Test backend detection
|
||||
4. Verify pytest suite passes
|
||||
|
||||
### Week 2 Start (Monday)
|
||||
|
||||
1. Install `kicad-python` package
|
||||
2. Test IPC connection
|
||||
3. Begin project.py migration
|
||||
4. Create first IPC API tests
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 🏆 Session 2 Achievements
|
||||
|
||||
### Infrastructure
|
||||
|
||||
- ✅ Automated Linux installation
|
||||
- ✅ Pre-commit hooks for code quality
|
||||
- ✅ Enhanced npm scripts
|
||||
- ✅ IPC API abstraction layer (800+ lines)
|
||||
|
||||
### Documentation
|
||||
|
||||
- ✅ Updated README (Linux-primary)
|
||||
- ✅ 30-page IPC migration plan
|
||||
- ✅ Session summaries
|
||||
|
||||
### Architecture
|
||||
|
||||
- ✅ Backend abstraction pattern
|
||||
- ✅ Factory with auto-detection
|
||||
- ✅ SWIG backward compatibility
|
||||
- ✅ IPC skeleton ready for implementation
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 🎉 Overall Day Summary
|
||||
|
||||
**Sessions 1+2 Combined:**
|
||||
|
||||
- ⏱️ **Time:** ~4-5 hours total
|
||||
- 📝 **Files:** 27 created
|
||||
- 💻 **Code:** ~3,000+ lines
|
||||
- 📚 **Docs:** 8 comprehensive pages
|
||||
- 🧪 **Tests:** 20+ unit tests
|
||||
- ✅ **Week 1:** 95% complete
|
||||
|
||||
**Status:** 🟢 **AHEAD OF SCHEDULE**
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## 🚀 Momentum Check
|
||||
|
||||
**Energy Level:** 🔋🔋🔋🔋🔋 (Maximum)
|
||||
**Code Quality:** ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ (Excellent)
|
||||
**Documentation:** 📖📖📖📖📖 (Comprehensive)
|
||||
**Architecture:** 🏗️🏗️🏗️🏗️🏗️ (Solid)
|
||||
|
||||
**Ready for Week 2 IPC Migration:** ✅ YES!
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
**End of Session 2**
|
||||
**Next:** KiCAD installation + testing + Week 2 kickoff
|
||||
|
||||
Let's keep this incredible momentum going! 🎉🚀
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user